AIRASIAN, P.W. The use of heirarchies in the analysis and planning of chemistry instruction.Science Education
BALZER, L. Non-verbal and verbal behaviours of biology teachers.American Biology Teacher, 1969,31, 226–229.
BALZER, L. Teacher behaviors and student enquiry in biology.American Biology Teacher, 1970,32, 26–28.
CLARKE, J.A. The role of the content and structure of curriculum material in cognition.Science Education: Research 1973, 1973, 119–141.
DUNKIN, M.J. & BIDDLE, B.J.The study of teaching. New York: Rinehart and Winston, 1974.
EGELSTON, J. Inductive vs. traditional methods of teaching high school biology laboratory experiments.Science Education
EGGLESTON, J.F., GALTON, M.J. & JONES, M.E.A science teaching observation schedule. London: Macmillan Education, 1975.
EGGLESTON, J. & GALTON, M. Curriculum evaluation and interaction analysis.British Journal of Teacher Education, 1976,2, 189–198.
EISNER, E.W. Curriculum development in Stanford University’s Kettering project: recollections and ruminations.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1975,7, 26–41.
EVANS, T.P. & BALZER, L. An inductive approach to the study of biology teacher behaviors.Journal of Research in Science Teaching
FERGUSON, J.The open university from within. London: University of London Press, 1975.
FOX, S. A practical image of “the practical”.Curriculum Theory Network
GARDNER, P.L. The P.S.S.C. text: a measure of its readability.Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 1968,14(3), 71–74.
GOOD, T.L. & POWER, C.N. Designing successful classroom environments for different types of studients.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1976,8, 45–60.
HALEY, S.B. & GOOD, R.G. Concrete and formal operational thought: implications for introductory college biology.The American Biology Teacher, 1976,38, 407–412, 430.
HARRIS, D. Educational technology at the Open University: a short history of achievement and cancellation.British Journal of Educational Technology
HEGARTY, E. The problem identification phase of curriculum deliberation: use of the nominal group technique.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1977,9, 31–41.
HEGARTY, E. Problems associated with current full-time, degree-level educational programmes for medical laboratory personnel I. Procedures used to identify problems.Australian Journal of Medical Technology, 1978,9, 7–12.
HERRON, M.D. The nature of scientific enquiry.School Review
HOLCOMB, C.M. The effect of degrees of direction in the qualitative analysis laboratory on retention of learning.Journal of Research in Science Teaching
HOLSTI, O.R.Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
INGLE, R.B. & SHAYER, M. Conceptual demands in Nuffield O-level chemistry.Education in Chemistry, 1971,8, 182–183.
JOHNSON, M. Definitions and models in curriculum theory.Educational Theory, 1967,17, 127–140.
JOHNSON, M. The translation of curriculum into instruction.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1969,1, 115–131.
KEISLAR, E.R. & SHULMAN, L.S. The problem of discovery: conference in retrospect. In L.S. Shulman & E.R. Keislar (eds),Learning by discovery: a critical appraisal. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
KERLINGER, F.N.Foundations of behavioral research. (2nd ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.
KLOPFER, L.E. Evaluation of learning in science. In B.S. Bloom, J.T. Hastings & G.F. Madaus (eds),Student learning. New York: McGraw Hill, 1971.
LAWSON, A.E. & RENNER, J.W. Piagetian theory and biology teaching.The American Biology Teacher, 1975,37, 336–343.
LEWIS, B.N. Course production at the Open University I: some basic problems.British Journal of Educational Technology
LEWIS, B.N. Course production at the Open University II: activities and activity networks.British Journal of Educational Technology
LEWIS, B.N. Course production at the Open University III: planning and scheduling.British Journal of Educational Technology
MacDONALD, B. & WALKER, R. (eds).Changing the curriculum. Melbourne: Macmillan, 1976.
McCLELLAN, J.E. Classroom-teaching research: a philosophical critique. In I. Westbury & A.A. Bellack (eds),Research into classroom processes: recent developments and next steps. New York: Teachers College Press, 1971.
MELTON, R.F. Course evaluation at the Open University: a case study.British Journal of Educational Technology
MILLER, E.J. (ed.).Task and organization. London: Wiley, 1976.
MITCHELL, J.V. Education’s challenge to psychology: the prediction of behaviour from person-environment interactions.Review of Educational Research
NELSON, M.A. Discussion strategies and learning science principles.Journal of Research in Science Teaching
NEWEY, C. On being a course team chairman.Teaching at a Distance, 1975,1(4), 47–51.
NEWMAN, B.S. The scientific status of any so-called science.Research in Science Education, 1978,8, 1–9.
PIAGET, J. Development and learning.Journal of Research in Science Teaching
POWER, C. A critical review of science classroom interaction studies.Studies in Science Education, 1977,4, 1–30.
POWER, C.N. & TISHER, R.P. Relationships between classroom behavior and instructional outcomes in an individualized science program.Journal of Research in Science Teaching
REID, W.A. & WALKER, D.F. (eds).Case studies in curriculum change. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.
RILEY, J. Course teams at the Open University.Studies in Higher Education
SABAR, N. An integrative in-service training for a curriculum team.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1977,9, 81–89.
SCHWAB, J.J. The teaching of science as enquiry. In J.J. Schwab & P.F. Brandwein (eds),The teaching of science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1962.
SCHWAB, J.J. The structure of the natural sciences. In G.W. Ford & L. Pugno (eds),The structure of knowledge and the curriculum. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964.
SCHWAB, J.J. The practical: a language for curriculum.School Review
SCHWAB, J.J. The practical 2: arts of electic.School Review
SCHWAB, J.J. The practical 3: translation into curriculum.School Review
SCHWAB, J.J. Decision and choice: the coming duty of science teaching,Journal of Research in Science Teaching
SCHWAB, J.J. Foreword in W.A. Reid & D.F. Walker (eds),Case studies in curriculum change. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.
SCOTT, W.A. Reliability of content analysis: the case of nominal coding.Public Opinion Quarterly
SHAYER, M. How to assess science courses.Education in Chemistry, 1970,7, 182–184, 186.
SHAYER, M. Conceptual demands in the Nuffield O-level biology course.School Science Review, 1974,56, 381–388.
SHEPHERD, S.R. A checklest for analysing the ‘style’ of instructional materials.Research 1972, 1972, 28–33.
TAMIR, P. & JUNGWIRTH, E. Botany and zoology—a curriculum problem.Journal of Research in Science Teaching
TISHER, R.P. Classroom interaction analysis: the new religion.Research 1972, 1972, 35–49.
WALKER, D.F. Strategies of deliberation in three curriculum development projects. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 1971.
WALKER, D.F. Curriculum development in an art project. In W.A. Reid, & D.F. Walker (eds),Case studies in curriculum change: Great Britain and the United States, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.
WESTBURY, I. Curriculum evaluation.Review of Educational Research
WOLFSON, M.L. Lectures versus individual research: their effect on retention.Journal of College Science Teaching, 1976,6(1), 36–37.