Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction of proteins with sorghum tannin: Mechanism, specificity and significance

  • Technical
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

Abstract

The grain of some varieties of sorghum contains 2% or more condensed tannin; many other varieties contain no tannin at all. Agronomic advantages, e.g., resistance to bird depredation, are associated with high-tannin sorghums, which have relatively low nutritional value for nonruminants. The biological effects of tannin are a result of its propensity for binding proteins; both hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions are involved. Sorghum tannins can bind dietary proteins and reduce their digestibility. Purified digestive enzymes are inhibited by tannin, but significant inhibition in vivo is unlikely. Proteins differ greatly in their affinity for tannin. Those with highest affinity are large, have an open structure, contain no bound carbohydrate and are rich in proline. Sorghum proteins of the alcohol-soluble prolamine fraction associate strongly with tannin, are difficult to remove during tannin purification and are found combined with tannin in the indigestible residue after in vitro digestion with pepsin. On germination, the seed may sacrifice a portion of these proteins to bind the tannin that might otherwise interfere with metabolism by inhibiting seed enzymes. During seed development, tannin molecules are relatively short and do not effectively precipitate proteins; as the seed dries, tannins undergo polymerization to an average of ca. 6 flavan-3-ol units/molecule. The antinutritional effects of sorghum tannins can be eliminated by soaking the grain in dilute aqueous alkali, but not by cooking. When rats are put on high-tannin sorghum diets, their parotid glands undergo hypertrophy and produce a group of unique salivary proteins with extremely high affinity for tannin. These proteins contain over 40% proline and are devoid of sulfur-containing and aromatic amino acids. This metabolic adaption may protect rats against tannin by binding and inactivating it immediately when it enters the digestive tract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haslam, E., in The Biochemistry of plants, Vol. 7, edited by P.K. Stumpf and E.E. Conn, Academic Press, New York, 1981, p. 527.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McManus, J.P., K.G. Davis, T.H. Lilley and E. Haslam, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Comm., 309 (1981).

  3. Price, M.L., A.M. Stromberg and L.G. Butler, J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:1270 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hagerman, A.E., and L.G. Butler, Ibid. 28:944 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Neucere, N.J., and G. Sumrell, Ibid. 28:19 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Price, M.L., and L.G. Butler, Bulletin No. 272 of the Agricultural Experiment Station, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruggers, R.L., and M.M. Jaeger, Sorghum in the Eighties: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sorghum, 2–7 Nov., 1981, ICRISAT, Patancheru, A.P., India, 1982, p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris, H.B., Proceedings of the 24th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference 24:113 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harris, H.B., and R.E. Burns, Agronomy J. 65:957 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris, H.B., and R.E. Burns, Ibid. 62:835 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sells, D.R., Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gustavson, K.H., J. Polymer Science 12:317 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oh, H.I., J.E. Hoff, G.S. Armstrong and L.A. Haff, J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:394 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Meek, K.M., and J.B. Weiss, Biochem. Biophys. Acta 587:112 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leatham, G.F., V. King and M.A. Stahmann, Phytopathology 70:1134 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hagerman, A.E., and L.G. Butler, J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:809 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hagerman, A.E., Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hagerman, A.E., and L.G. Butler, J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:947 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hagerman, A.E., and L.G. Butler, J. Biol. Chem. 256:4494 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Aoki, K., R. Shinke and H. Nishira, Agric. Biol. Chem. 45:121 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oh, H.I., and J.E. Hoff, J. Food Science 44:87 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Haslam, E., Biochem. J. 139:285 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Armstrong, G., M.S. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Watanabe, T., T. Mori, T. Tosa and I. Chibata, Agric. Biol. Chem. 45:1001 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Watanabe, T., T. Mori, T. Tosa and I. Chibata, J. Chromatog. 207:13 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramachandran, G.N., and C. Ramakrishnan, in Biochemistry of Collagen, edited by G.N. Ramachandran and A.H. Reddi, Plenum Press, NY, 1976, p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Strumeyer, D.R., and M.J. Malin, Biochem. J. 118:899 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jambunathan, R., and E.T. Mertz, J. Agric. Food Chem. 21:692 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fishman, M.L., and N.J. Neucere, J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:477 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rostagno, H.W., W.R. Featherston and J.C. Rogler, Poultry Science 52:765 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nelson, T.S., E.L. Stephenson, A. Burgos, J. Floyd and J.O. York, Ibid. 54:1620 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cousins, B.W., T.D. Tanksley, Jr., D.A. Knabe and T. Zebrowska, J. Animal Science 53:1524 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Knabe, D.A., Proc. of the Sorghum Food Quality Workshop, CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico, April 13–17, 1982, p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schaffert, R.E., V.L. Lechtenberg, D.L. Oswalt, J.D. Axtell, R.C. Pickett and C.L. Rhykerd, Crop Science 14:640 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chibber, B.A.-K., E.T. Mertz and J.D. Axtell, J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:160 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hahn, D.H., J.M. Faubion, S.H. Ring, C.A. Doherty and L.W. Rooney, Cereal Chem. 59:132 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Griffiths, D.W., and G. Mosely, J. Science Food Agric. 31:255 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Armstrong, G., Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Henneke, C.M., and R.T. Wedding, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 168:443 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bhat, C.S., and T. Ramasarma, Biochem. J. 181:143 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kelly, S.J., D.E. Dardinger and L.G. Butler, Biochemistry 14:4983 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Price, M.L., A.E. Hagerman and L.G. Butler, Nutrition Reports International 21:761 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mehansho, H., A.E. Hagerman, L.S. Clements, L.G. Butler, J. Rogler and D.M. Carlson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Science U.S., 80:3948 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Watterson, J.J., and L.G. Butler, J. Agric. Food Chem. 31:41 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Blakely, M.E., L.W. Rooney, R.D. Sullins and F.R. Miller, Crop Science 19:837 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Morrall, P., N. v. d. W. Liebenberg and C.W. Glennie, Scanning Electron Microscopy 3:571 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Oberthur, E., R.L. Nicholson and L.G. Butler, J. Agric. Food Chem. 31:660 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Butler, L.G., Ibid. 30:1090 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Daiber, K.H., J. Science Food and Agric. 26:1399 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Watson, T.G., and L. Novellie, Agrochemophysica 8:61 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Price, M.L., L.G. Butler, J.C. Rogler and W.R. Featherston, J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:441 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Armstrong, W.D., J.C. Rogler and W.R. Featherston, Poultry Science 53:714 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Muindi, P.J., S. Thomke and R. Ekman, J. Sci. Food Agric. 32:25 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Chavan, J.K., S.S. Kadam, C.P. Ghonsikar and D.K. Salunkhe, J. Food Sci. 44:1319 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. McGrath, R.M., W.Z. Kaluza, K.H. Daiber, W.B. van der Riet and C.W. Glennie, J. Agric. Food Chem. 30:450 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Butler, L.G., Riedl, D.J., Lebryk, D.G. et al. Interaction of proteins with sorghum tannin: Mechanism, specificity and significance. J Am Oil Chem Soc 61, 916–920 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02542166

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02542166

Keywords

Navigation