Science teachers' beliefs about curriculum design
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Teacher beliefs about curriculum design affect the quality of science education in schools, but science researchers know little about the interrelation of beliefs about alternative curriculum designs. This article describes a quantitative study of secondary science teachers' beliefs about curriculum design. A 33-item Science Curriculum Orientation Inventory (SCOI) was developed to measure five distinct orientations to curriculum: academic, cognitive processes, societycentred, humanistic, and technological. Data were collected from 810 integrated science, chemistry, physics, and biology teachers in Hong Kong. A confirmatory factor analysis of teacher responses to the SCOI indicated that science teachers' beliefs about curriculum design had a hierarchical structure; the five distinct curriculum orientations were positively correlated, forming a second-order curriculum, meta-orientation. Physics teachers were less society-oriented than biology, integrated science and chemistry teachers, and integrated science teachers were more humanistic than physics teachers. Although science teachers' beliefs about any of the five alternative curriculum designs did not vary with their teaching experience, the difference between beliefs about the cognitive processes orientation and the humanistic orientation increased when teachers had gained more teaching experience. Implications of these findings are discussed.
- Aguirre, J. M., Haggerty, S. M., & Linder,C. J. (1990). Student-teachers' conceptions of science, teaching and learning: A case study in preservice science education.International Journal of Science Education, 12(4), 381–390.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1970).Science: A process approach. Washington, DC: AAAS/ Xerox Corporation.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989).Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
- American Chemical Society. (1998).ChemCom: Chemistry in the community (3rd ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
- Berkheimer, G. D., & Lott, G. W. (1984). Science educators' and graduate students' perceptions of science education objectives for the 1980s.Science Education, 68(2), 105–116.
- Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice.Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62.
- Bybee, R. W., & DeBoer, G. E. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.),Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 357–387). New York: National Science Teachers Association.
- Bybee, R. W., & Welch, I. D. (1972). The third force: Humanistic psychology and science education.The Science Teacher, 39, 18–22.
- Carin, A. A. (1971). Let's have some humanistic, society-oriented science teaching.Science and Children, 9, 29–32.
- Cheung, D. (2000). Measuring teachers' meta-orientations to curriculum: Application of of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis.Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 149–165.
- Cheung, D., & Ng, P. H. (submitted). Teachers' beliefs about curriculum: Evidence of a superordinate curriculum meta-orientation construct.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice.
- Cronin-Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 235–250.
- Curriculum Development Council. (1993).Syllabus for physics (secondary 4–5). Hong Kong: Government Printer.
- Curriculum Development Council. (1995).Syllabus for secondary schools: Chemistry (advanced level), Hong Kong: Government Printer.
- Dreyfus, A. (1987). The validation of developers' assumptions about a technology-minded biological curriculum.Research in Science & Technological Education, 5(2), 173–183.
- Eisner, E. W., & Vallance, E. (Ed.). (1974).Conflicting conceptions of curriculum. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
- Good, R., & Berger, C. (1998). The computer as powerful tool for understanding science. In J. J. Mintzes J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.),Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 213–227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Harms, N. C., & Yager, R. E. (Eds.). (1981).What research says to the science teacher. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
- Hewson, P. W., Kerby, H. W., & Cook, P. A. (1995). Determining the conceptions of teaching science held by experienced high school science teachers.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 503–520.
- Hofstein, A., & Yager, R. E. (1982). Societal issues as organisers for science education in the '80s.School Science and Mathematics, 82(7), 539–547. CrossRef
- Jenkins, E. W. (1992). School science education: Towards a reconstruction.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(3), 229–246.
- Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996).LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
- Klein, M. F. (1986). Alternative curriculum conceptions and designs.Theory into Practice, 21, 31–35. CrossRef
- Lantz, O., & Kass, H. (1987). Chemistry teachers' functional paradigms.Science Education, 71(1), 117–134.
- Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.
- Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behaviour?Science Education, 71(5), 721–734.
- Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (1998). Science teacher beliefs and intentions to implement science-technology-society (STS) in the classroom.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 1–24. CrossRef
- Marsh, E. J., & Kumar, D. D. (1992). Hypermedia: A conceptual framework for science education and review of recent findings.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, 25–37.
- Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and thier invariance across groups,Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582. CrossRef
- McIntosh, W. J., & Zeidler D. L. (1988). Teachers' conceptions of the contemporary goals of science education.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(2), 93–102.
- McNeil, J. D. (1996,Curriculum: A comprehensive introduction (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
- Miller, J. P. (1983).The education spectrum: Orientations to curriculum. New York: Longman.
- Moheno, P. B. B. (1993). Toward a fully human science education: An exploratory study of prospective teachers' attitudes toward humanistic science education.International Journal of Science Education, 15(1), 95–106.
- National Research Council. (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
- Ornstein, A. C. (1982). Curriculum contrasts: A historical overview.Phi Delta Kappan, 63(6), 404–408.
- Rutherford, F. J. (1972). A humanistic approach to science teaching.NASSP Bulletin, 56, 53–62.
- Screen, P. (1986). The Warwick process science project.School Science Review, 68(242), 12–16.
- Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching.Teaching & Teacher Education, 5(1), 1–20. CrossRef
- Stinner, A. (1995). Contextual settings, science stories, and large context problems: Toward a more humanistic science education.Science Education, 79(5), 555–581.
- Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum.Science and Education, 6(4), 355–371. CrossRef
- Watts, M., & Bentley, D. (1994). Humanising and feminising school science: Reviving anthropomorphic and animistic thinking in constructivist science education.International Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 83–97.
- Yager, R. E., & Penick, J. E. (1988). Changes in perceived attitudes toward the goals for science instruction in schools.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(3), 179–184.
- Science teachers' beliefs about curriculum design
Research in Science Education
Volume 30, Issue 4 , pp 357-375
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links