- A. F. J. Van Raan
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this presentation we argue that the core research activities of scientometries fall in four interrelated areas: science and technology indicators, information systems on science and technology, the interaction between science and technology, and cognitive as well as socioorganisational structures in science and technology.
We emphasize that an essential condition for the healthy development of the field is a careful balance between application and basic work, in which the applied side is the driving force. In other words: scientometrics is primarily a field of applied science. This means that the interaction users' is at least as important as the interaction with colleague-scientists. We state that this situation is very stimulating, it strengthens methodology and it activates basic work. We consider idea of scientometrics lacking theoretical content or being otherwise in a 'crisis-like' situation groundless.
Scientometrics is in a typical developmental stage in which the creativity of its individual researchers and the ‘climate’ and facilities of their institutional environments determine the Progress in the field and, particularly, its relation with other disciplines. These aspects also contribute substantially to the reputation of scientometrics as a research field respected by the broader scientific community. And this latter point is important, both to let quantitative studies of science and technology take more advantage of an academic environment, as well as to keep it innovative and thus attractive in terms of applications at the longer term.
- T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Scientometric indicator datafiles. A multidimensional machine readable database for evaluative purposes.Scientometrics, 28 (1993) 137–150. CrossRef
- A. F. J. van Raan, Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises,Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 397–420. CrossRef
- L. Egghe, Bridging the gaps: Conceptual discussions on informetrics,Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 35–48. CrossRef
- F. Narin, K. S. Hamilton, D. Olwastro,Linkage between agency-supported research and patented industrial technology, Research Evaluation, (1996) to be published.
- G. Lewison, Publications from the European Community's Biotechnology Action Programme (BAP): Multi-nationality, acknowledgement of support, and citations,Scientometrics, 31 (1994) 125–142. CrossRef
- H. F. Moed, R. E. De Bruin, Th. N. Van Leeuwen, New bibliometric tools for the assessment national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications,Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 381–422. CrossRef
- I. Gabolde, Opening address to the First Int. Conf. on the Evaluation of Research, Technology Development,Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 317–320. CrossRef
- R. N. Kostoff, Federal research impact assessment: Axioms, approaches, applications,Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 163–206. CrossRef
- S. Cozzens, U. S. research assessment: Recent developments,Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 351–362. CrossRef
- W. A. Smith, Evaluating research, technology and development in Canadian industry: Meeting challenges of industrial innovation,Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 527–539. CrossRef
- W. Glänzel, U. Schoepflin, Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ….. and beyond?Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 375–384. CrossRef
- H. E. Roosendaal, Roles of bibliometrics in scientific communication,Research Evaluation, (1996) to be published.
- R. J. W. TIijssen, A. F. J. Van Raan, Mapping changes in science and technology: bibliometric cooccurrence analysis of the R&D literature.Evaluation Review, 18 (1994) 98–115.
- W. Glänzel, The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology,Scientometrics, (1996) 167-176.
- H. F. Moed, Differences in the construction of SCI based bibliometric indicators among various producers: A first overview,Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 177–192. CrossRef
- J. S. Katz, Bibliometric standards: Personal experience and lessons learned,Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 193–198. CrossRef
- K. Debackere, B. Clarysse, Advanced bibliometric methods to model the relationship between entry-behavior and networking in emerging technological communities,Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS), (1996) to be published.
- H. Moxham, J. Anderson, Peer review: a view from the inside,Science and Technology Policy, (1992) 7–15.
- A. J. Nederhof, E. C. M. Noyons, International comparison of departments' research performance the humanities,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (JASIS), 43 (1992) 249–256. CrossRef
- M. Zitt, F. Perrot, R. Barre, The transition from ‘national’ to ‘transnational’ model and related measures of countries' performance,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (JASIS), (1996) to be published.
- H. Grupp, U. Schmoch, K. Koschatzky, Science and technology infrastructure in Baden-Württemberg and its orientation toward future regional development,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (JASIS), (1996) to be published.
- Scientometrics: State-of-the-art
Volume 38, Issue 1 , pp 205-218
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Science and Technology Studies, University of Leiden, Wassenaarseweg 52, P.O. Box 9555, 2300, RB Leiden, The Netherlands