The foundations of Kaplan's direct reference theory for demonstratives
- Lawrence D. roberts
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
- Bach, Kent. (1992). “Intentions and Demonstrations.”Analysis, 52 140–146.
- Deutsch, Harry (1989). “On Direct Reference.”Themes from Kaplan, ed. by Joseph Almog, John Perry, and Howard Wettstein. New York: Oxford University Press, 167–195.
- Donnellan, Keith (1966). “Reference and Definite Descriptions.”Philosophical Review. 75, 281–304.
- Frege, Gottlob (1892). “uber Sinn und Bedeutung.”Zeitschrift fur Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100; trans. as “On Sense and Nominatum.”Contemporary Readings in Logical Theory, ed. by Copi and Gould. New York: Macmillan, 1967.
- Frege, Gottlob (1956). “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry.”Mind. 65, 289–311.
- Friedman, Joel I. (1980). “Bare Kripkean Necessity.” paper read at the Eastern Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association.
- Kaplan, David (1969). “Quantifying In.”Words and Objections: Essays on the work of W.V. Quine, ed. by D. Davidson and J. Hintikka. Dordrecht: Reidel, 178–214.
- Kaplan, David (1978). “Dthat.”Syntax and Semantics. 9, 221–243.
- Kaplan, David (1989a). “Demonstratives” Themes from Kaplan, ed. by Joseph Almog, John Perry, and Howard Wettstein. New York: Oxford University Press, 481–563. (Abbreviated as ‘D’ in references.)
- Kaplan, David (1989b). “Afterthoughts.”Themes from Kaplan, ed. by Joseph Almog, John Perry, and Howard Wettstein. New York: Oxford University Press, 565–614. (Abbreviated as ‘A’ in references.)
- Kaplan, David. (1989c) “Words.” paper presented at Cornell University, May 2, 1989.
- Kaplan, David (1990). “Thoughts on Demonstratives.” inDemonstratives, ed. by Palle Yourgrau. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 34–49.
- Krech, D., Cruthchfield, R.S. and Livson, N. (1969).Elements of Psychology. New York: Knopf.
- Moravcsik, Julius (1981). “Frege and Chomsky on Thought and Language.”Midwest Studies in Philosophy, VI, ed. by French, P.A., Uehling, T.E., and Wettstein, H.K. 105–123.
- Moulton, John, and Roberts, Lawrence D. (1991). “An AI Model for Indexical Reference Using Conceptual Graphs and Neural Nets.Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Workshop on Conceptual Graphs. Binghamton.
- Moulton, John, and Roberts, Lawrence D. (1992). “A Hybrid Model for Indexical Reference.”The Journal for Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence. 4, 141–148.
- Roberts, Lawrence D. (1986). “The Figure-Ground Model for the Explanation of the Determination of Indexical Reference.”Synthese. 68, 441–486. CrossRef
- Roberts, Lawrence D. (1992). “Pure Indexicals vs. True Demonstratives: A Difference in Compactness.” manuscript.
- Roberts, Lawrence D. (1993).How Reference Works: Explanatory Models for Indexicals, Descriptions, and Opacity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Roberts, Lawrence D. (forthcoming). “Perry's Essential Indexicals and the Relation of Semantics and Psychology.”Communication and Cognition.
- Russell, Bertrand (1903).The Principles of Mathematics. London: Allen and Unwin.
- Salmon, Nathan U. (1981).Reference and Essence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Smith, A.D. (1987). “Semantical Considerations on Rigid Designation.”Mind. 96, 83–92.
- Steinman, Robert (1985). “Kripke Rigidity versus Kaplan Rigidity.”Mind. 94, 431–442.
- Taschek, William W. (1987). “Content, Character, and Cognitive Significance.”Philosophical Studies. 52, 161–189. CrossRef
- Vision, Gerald (1985). “I Am Not Here Now.”Analysis, 45, 198–199.
- The foundations of Kaplan's direct reference theory for demonstratives
Volume 23, Issue 1-4 , pp 91-116
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. State University of New York, 13902, Binghamton, New York, USA