Distributive and procedural justice in interpersonal and intergroup situations: Issues, solutions, and extensions
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper addresses theoretical issues relating to distributive and procedural justice. Specifically, comparisons are made between interpersonal and intergroup situations. Within the realm of distributive justice, two reinterpretations of the ingroup allocation bias are offered. One reinterpretation states that people show this bias to prevent being exploited by the outgroup. The other reinterpretation states that the bias can be regarded as a measure of the perceived worth of the ingroup in relation to the outgroup. The related issue of the procedure used for allocating resources is addressed by extending Tyler and Lind's (1992) Relational Model of Authority to all ingroup members in both interpersonal and intergroup situations. Reinterpretations and extensions offered in this paper lead to new theoretical insights and to several suggestions and predictions for future empirical research.
- Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–299.
- Berkowitz, L., and Walster, E. (eds.), (1976).Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York.
- Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1980). Status organizing processes.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 6: 479–508. CrossRef
- Berger, J., Wagner, D. G., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1985). Introduction: Expectation States Theory: Review and assessment. In Berger, J. and Zelditch, M. Jr. (eds.),Status, Rewards, and Influence, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, pp. 1–72.
- Billig, M. (1976).Social Psychology and Intergroup Relations, Academic Press, London.
- Bornstein, G., Crum, L., Wittenbraker, J., Harring, K., Insko, C. A., and Thibaut, J. (1983). On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 13: 321–350.
- Branthwaite, A., Doyle, S., and Lightbown, N. (1979). The balance between fairness and discrimination.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 9: 149–163.
- Branthwaite, A., and Jones, J. E. (1975). Fairness and discrimination: English versus Welsh.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 5: 323–338.
- Brown R. (1978). Divided we fall: An analysis of relations between sections of a factory force. In Tajfel, H. (ed.),Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Academic Press, London, pp. 395–429.
- Caddick, B. (1981). Equity theory, social identity, and intergroup relations. In Wheeler, L. (ed.),Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 1, Sage, Beverley Hills: pp. 219–245.
- Cohen, B. P., and Zhou, X. G. (1991). Status processes in enduring work groups.Am. Sociol. Rev. 56: 179–188.
- Commins, B., and Lockwood, J. (1979). The effects of status differences, favored treatment and equity in intergroup comparisons.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 9: 281–289.
- Diehl, M. (1989). Justice and discrimination between minimal groups: The limits of equity.Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 28: 227–238.
- Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?J. Soc. Issues 31: 137–149.
- Hogg, M. A., and Abrams, D. (1990). Social motivation, self-esteem and social identity. In Abrams, D., and Hogg, M. A. (eds.),Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 28–47.
- Hogg, M. A., and Sunderland, J. (1991). Self-esteem and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm.Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 30, 51–62.
- Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C., Nascimento-Schulze, C., and Spriggs, D., (1986). Social categorization, intergroup behavior and self-esteem: Two experiments.Rev. Psicol. Soc. 1: 23–38.
- Homans, G. C. (1961).Social Behavior, Its Elementary Forms, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
- Hui, C. H., Triandis, H. C., and Yee, C. (1991). Cultural differences in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation?Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 30: 145–157.
- Lemyre, L., and Smith, P. (1985). Intergroup discrimination and self-esteem in the minimal group paradigm.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49: 660–670.
- Leung, K., and Bond, M. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 47: 793–804.
- Leventhal, G. S., Karaza, J., Jr., and Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In Mikula, G. (ed.),Justice and Social Interaction Huber, Bern, Switzerland.
- Mann, L., Radford, M., and Kanagawa, C. (1985). Cross-cultural differences in children's use of decision rules: A comparison between Japan and Australia.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49: 1557–1564.
- Messick, D. M., and Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations.Ann. Rev. Psychol., 40: 45–81. CrossRef
- Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. P. (1985). Estimating social and non-social utility functions from ordinal data.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 15: 389–399.
- Ng, S. H. (1977). Power: The dimension of ranking in interpersonal and intergroup behavior. Unpublished Ph.D., thesis, University of Bristol.
- Ng, S. H. (1981). Equity theory and the allocation of rewards between groups.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 11: 439–443.
- Ng, S. H. (1984). Equity and social categorization effects on intergroup allocation of rewards.Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 23: 165–172.
- Oakes, P. J., and Turner, J. C. (1980). Social categorization and intergroup bias: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive?Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 10: 295–301.
- Parcel, T. L., and Cook, K. S. (1977). Status characteristics, reward allocation, and equity,Sociometry 40: 311–324.
- Perelman, C. (1963).The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
- Platow, M. J., McClintock, C. G., and Liebrand, W. B. G. (1990). Predicting intergroup fairness and ingroup bias in the minimal group, paradigm.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 20: 221–239.
- Sachdev, I., and Bourhis, R. Y. (1987). Status differences and intergroup behavior.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 17: 277–293.
- Sachdev, I., and Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 21: 1–24.
- Schwinger, T. (1980). Just allocation of goods: Decisions among three principles. In Mikula, G. (ed.),Justice and Social Interaction, Huber, Bern, Switzerland.
- Shaw, M. E. (1976).Dynamics of Small Group Behavior, McGraw Hill, New York.
- Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., and Sherif, C. (1961).Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. The Robber's Cave Experiment, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
- Stake, J. E. (1983). Factors in reward distribution: Allocator motive, gender, and protestant ethic endorsement.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44: 410–418.
- Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination.Sci. Am. 223: 96–102.
- Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G., and Worchel, S. (eds.).The Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Wadsworth, Belmont, MA, pp. 33–47.
- Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M. G., and Bundy, R. F. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1: 149–177.
- Törnblom, K. Y., Jonsson, D., and Foa, U. G. (1985). Nationality, resource class, and preferences among three allocation rules: Sweden vs. USA.Int. J. Intercultural Rel. 9: 51–77.
- Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behavior.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 5: 5–34.
- Turner, J. C. (1980). Fairness or discrimination in intergroup behavior? A reply to Branthwaite, Doyle and Lightbown.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 10: 131–147.
- Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism.Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 9: 187–204.
- Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (1987).Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.
- Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. P., (eds.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press, New York, pp. 115–191.
- Vanbeselaere, N. (1993). Ingroup bias in the minimal group situation: An experimental test of the inequity prevention hypothesis.Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 14: 385–400.
- Wagstaff, G. F., and Perfect, T. (1992). On the definition of perfect equity and the prediction of inequity.Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 31: 69–77.
- Distributive and procedural justice in interpersonal and intergroup situations: Issues, solutions, and extensions
Social Justice Research
Volume 8, Issue 1 , pp 103-121
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- distributive justice
- procedural justice
- ingroup bias
- intergroup processes
- social identity