Alper, L., Fendel, D., Fraser, S., & Resek, D. (1996). Problem-based mathematics: Not just for the college-bound.Educational Leadership, 53(8), 18–21.
Angeli, C., Bonk, C., Supplee, L., & Malikowski, S. (1998). A case-based electronic learning environment for preservice teacher education.Technology and Teacher Education Annual—1998. Reston, VA: AACE.
Barab, S., & Landa, A. (1997). Designing effective inter-disciplinary anchors.Educational Leadership, 54(6), 52–55.
Bednar, A., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T., & Perry, J. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we link? In T. Duffy and D. Jonassen (Eds.),Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Berson, M.J. (1996). Effectiveness of computer technology in the social studies: A review of the literature.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 486–499.
Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(4), 32–42.
Brush, T. (1997). The effects on student achievement and attitudes when using integrated learning systems in cooperative pairs.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45
Brush, T. (1998). Embedding cooperative learning into the design of Integrated Learning Systems: Rationale and guidelines.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46
Brush, T., & Saye, J. (1999, February).Instructional tools for student problem-solving: The Decision Point project. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX.
Choi, J., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design.Educational Technology Research and Development, 43
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited.Educational Technology, 33(3), 52–70.
Dewey, J. (1938).Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
Duffy, T., & Jonassen, D. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology?Educational Technology, May, 3–16.
Edmark. (1999).Millie's math house. [Computer Software]. Redmond, WA: Author.
Ehman, L.H., Glenn, A.D., Johnson, V., & White, C.S. (1998). Using computer databases in student problem solving. In J.A. Braun, P. Fernlund, & C.S. White (Eds.),Technology tools in the social studies curriculum (pp. 164–187). Wilsonville, OR: Frankilin, Beedle.
Felder, R., & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction.College Teaching, 44(2), 43–47.
Gallagher, S.A., & Stepien, W.J. (1996). Content acquisition in problem-based learning: Depth versus breadth in American studies.Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(3), 257–275.
Glasgow, N. (1997).New curriculum for new times: A guide to student-centered, problem-based learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1981).Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hannafin, M., Hall, C., Land, S., & Hill, J. (1994). Learning in open-ended environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications.Educational Technology, October, 48–55.
Hannafin, M., Hannafin, K., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45
Hannafin, M., Hill, J., & Land, S. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implication.Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94–99.
Hannafin, M., & Land, S. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments.Instructional Science, 25
Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models, Volume II. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hawley, C., & Duffy, T. (1997).Design model for learner-centered, computer-based simulations. ERIC Document Reproduction Service # ED 423 838
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1999, February).An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology conference, Houston, TX.
Hill, J., & Land, S. (1997).Open-ended learning environments: A theoretical framework and model for design. ERIC Document Reproduction Service # ED 423 839
Jackson, S., Stratford, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1995, April).Making system dynamics modeling accessible to pre-college science students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Jacobson, M., & Spiro, R. (1994). A framework for the contextual analysis of technology-based learning environments.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 5(2), 3–32.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1991).Learning together and alone. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jonassen, D. (1991). Evaluating constructivist learning.Educational Technology, September, 28–33.
Jonassen, D. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45
Krajcik, J., Soloway, E., Blumenfeld, P., & Marx, R. (1998). Scaffolded technology tools to promote teaching and learning in science. In C. Dede (Ed.),ASCD 1998 Yearbook: Learning with Technology. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Land, S., & Hannafin, M. (1994).Student-centered learning environments: Foundations, assumptions, and implications. ERIC Document Reproduction Service # ED 397 810
Linn, M. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4
Linn, M., Shear, L., Bell, P., & Slotta, J.D. (1999). Organizing principles for science education partnerships: Case studies of students' learning about ‘rats in space’ and ‘deformed frogs.’Educational Technology Research and Development, 47
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate?Educational Researcher, 17, 13–17.
McCombs, B., & Whisler, J.S. (1997).The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Fancisco: Jossey-Bass.
Means, B. (1994). Introduction: Using technology to advance educational goals. In B. Means (Ed.),Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S.B. (1988).Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Oliver, K. (1996).Realizing the potential of scaffolded instruction in situated learning environments: Lessons from a formative evaluation. ERIC Document Reproduction Service # ED 413 310
Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching and comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities.Cognition & Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
Roehler, L., & Cantlon, D. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.),Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
Savery, J.R., & Duffy, T.M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework.Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.
Saye, J.W. (1997). Technology and educational empowerment: Students' perspectives.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45
Saye, J.W. (1998). Technology in the classroom: The role of dispositions in teacher gatekeeping.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 13(3), 210–234.
Saye, J.W., & Brush, T. (1999). Student engagement with social issues in a multimedia-supported learning environment.Theory and Research in Social Education, 27(4), 468–500.
Scaradamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). An architecture for collaborative knowledge building. In E. DeCorte, M. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.),Computer-based learning environments and problem solving. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Schwartz, D.L., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J.D. (1999). Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47
Scott, B., & Brush, T.A. (1998). Teaching instructional technology: A problem-based learning approach.Canadian Journal of Educational Communications, 27(1), 1–18.
Sept, J. (1997).Investigating olduvai: Archaeology of human origins. [Computer Program]. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Slavin, R.E. (1995).Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Voss, J.F., Greene, T.R., Post, T.A., & Penner, B.C. (1983). Problem solving skill in the social sciences. In G.H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. New York: Academic.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wineburg, S.S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83
Yin, R. (1984).Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Young, M. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 41