On the sampling interpretation of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests in the context of conditional maximum likelihood estimation
- E. Maris
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In the context ofconditional maximum likelihood (CML) estimation, confidence intervals can be interpreted in three different ways, depending on the sampling distribution under which these confidence intervals contain the true parameter value with a certain probability. These sampling distributions are (a) the distribution of the data given theincidental parameters, (b) the marginal distribution of the data (i.e., with the incidental parameters integrated out), and (c) the conditional distribution of the data given the sufficient statistics for the incidental parameters. Results on the asymptotic distribution of CML estimates under sampling scheme (c) can be used to construct asymptotic confidence intervals using only the CML estimates. This is not possible for the results on the asymptotic distribution under sampling schemes (a) and (b). However, it is shown that theconditional asymptotic confidence intervals are also valid under the other two sampling schemes.
- Andersen, E. B. (1970). Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum likelihood estimators.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 32, 283–301.
- Andersen, E. B. (1973).Conditional inference and models for measuring. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mentalhygiejnisk Forlag, Copenhagen.
- Andersen, E. B., & Madsen, M. (1977). Estimating the parameters of the latent population distribution.Psychometrika, 42, 357–374.
- Cramèr, H. (1946).Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- de Leeuw, J., & Verhelst, N. (1986). Maximum likelihood estimation in generalized Rasch models.Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 183–196.
- Fischer, G. H. (1981). On the existence and uniqueness of maximum likelihood estimates in the Rasch model.Psychometrika, 53, 525–546.
- Follman, D. A. (1988). Consistent estimation in the Rasch model based on nonparametric margins.Psychometrika, 53, 553–562.
- Graybill, F. A. (1976).Theory and application of the linear model. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.
- Kiefer, J., & Wolfowitz, J. (1956). Consistency of the maximum likihood estimator in the presence of infinitely many nuisance parameters.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, 887–906.
- Lehmann, E. L. (1983).Theory of point estimation. New York: Wiley.
- Lindsay, B., Clogg, C. C., & Grego, J. (1991). Semiparametric estimation in the Rasch model and related exponential response models, including a simple latent class model for item analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 96–107.
- Pfanzagl, J. (1993). A case of asymptotic equivalence between conditional and marginal maximum likelihood estimators.Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 35, 301–307. CrossRef
- Pfanzagl, J. (1994). On item parameter estimation in certain latent trait models. In G. H. Fischer & D. Laming (Eds.),Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics and methodology (pp. 249–263). New York: Springer.
- On the sampling interpretation of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests in the context of conditional maximum likelihood estimation
Volume 63, Issue 1 , pp 65-71
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- CML estimation
- confidence intervals
- conditional inference
- Industry Sectors
- E. Maris (1) (2)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Mathematical Psychology (NICI), Catholic University of Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- 2. National Institute for Educational Measurement (CITO), The Netherlands