Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models
 Michael E. Sobel
 … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discount
Rent now* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Get AccessAbstract
This paper considers total and direct effects in linear structural equation models. Adopting a causal perspective that is implicit in much of the literature on the subject, the paper concludes that in many instances the effects do not admit the interpretations imparted in the literature. Drawing a distinction between concomitants and factors, the paper concludes that a concomitant has neither total nor direct effects on other variables. When a variable is a factor and one or more intervening variables are concomitants, the notion of a direct effect is not causally meaningful. Even when the notion of a direct effect is meaningful, the usual estimate of this quantity may be inappropriate. The total effect is usually interpreted as an equilibrium multiplier. In the case where there are simultaneity relations among the dependent variables in tghe model, the results in the literature for the total effects of dependent variables on other dependent variables are not equilibrium multipliers, and thus, the usual interpretation is incorrect. To remedy some of these deficiencies, a new effect, the total effect of a factorX on an outcomeY, holding a set of variablesF constant, is defined. When defined, the total and direct effects are a special case of this new effect, and the total effect of a dependent variable on a dependent variable is an equilibrium multiplier.
 Alwin, D. F., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis.American Sociological Review, 40, 37–47.
 Bentler, P. M., & Freeman, E. H. (1983). Tests for stability in linear structural equation systems.Psychometrika, 48, 143–145.
 Bollen, K. A., (1987). Total, direct and indirect effects in structural equation models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.),Sociological methodology, 1987 (pp. 37–69). Washinton, D. C.: American Sociological Association.
 Brand, M. (1976). Introduction: Defining causes. In M. Brand (Ed.),The nature of causation (pp. 1–44). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
 Chow, G. C. (1975).Analysis and control of dynamic economic systems. New York: Wiley.
 Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979).Quasiexperimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
 Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1981).Applied statistics. London: Chapman and Hall.
 Duncan, O. D. (1975).Introduction to structural equation models. New York: Academic.
 Fisher, F. M. (1970). A correspondence principle for simulataneous equation models.Econometrica, 38, 73–92.
 Fox, J. (1985). Effect analysis in structural equation models. II: Calculation of specific infirect effects.Sociological Methods and Research, 14, 81–95.
 Freedman, D. A. (1987). As others see us: A case study in path analysis.Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 101–129.
 Freeman, E. H. (1982).The implementation of effect decomposition methods for two general structural covariance modeling systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angels, Department of Psychology.
 Glymour, C. (1986). Statistics and metaphysics.Journal of the American Statitiscal Association, 81, 964–966.
 Goldberger, A. S. (1959).Impact multipliers and dynamic properties of the KleinGoldberger model. Amsterdam: North Holland.
 Graff, J., & Schmidt, P. (1982). A general model for decomposition of effects. In K. G. Jöreskog & D. Sörbom (Eds.),Systems under indirect observation, Part 1 (pp. 131–148). Amsterdam: North Holland.
 Graybill, F. A. (1983).Matrices with applications in statistics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
 Harary, F. R., Norman, Z., & Cartwright, D. (1965).Structural models: An introduction to the theory of directed graphs. New York: Wiley.
 Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–960.
 Holland, P. W. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equations models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.),Sociological Methodology, 1988. (pp. 449–484). Washington, D. C.: American Sociological Association.
 Hume, D. (1977).An enquiry concerning human understanding and A letter from a gentleman to his friend in Edinburgh. Indianapolis: Hackett.
 Hume, D. (1978).A treatise of human nature. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
 Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989).LISREL 7: User's reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
 Kerckhoff, A. C. (1974).Ambition and attainment. Washigton, D. C.: Sociological Association.
 Luenberger, D. C. (1979).Introduction to dynamic systems. New York: Wiley.
 Pratt, J. W., & Schlaifer, R. (1984). On the nature and discovery of structure.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 9–21.
 Rozeboom, W. R. (1956). Mediation variables in scientific theory.Psychological Review, 63, 249–264.
 Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.
 Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization.The Annals of Statistics, 6, 34–58.
 Rubin, D. B. (1986). Comment: Which ifs have causal answers.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 961–962.
 Salmon, W. C. (1984).Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
 Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.),Sociological Methodology, 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: JosseyBass.
 Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In N. B. Tuma (Ed.),Sociological Methodology, 1986 (pp. 159–186). Washinton, D. C.: American Sociological Association.
 Sobel, M. E. (1987). Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models.Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 155–176.
 Sobel, M. E., & Arminger, G. (1986). Platonic and operational true scores in covariance structure analysis: An invited comment on Bielby's ‘Arbitrary metrics in multiple indicator models of latent variables’.Sociological Methods and Research, 15, 44–58.
 Strotz, R. H., & Wold, H. O. A. (1960). Recursive vs. nonrecursive systems: An attempt at synthesis.Econometrica, 28, 417–427.
 Tinbergen, J. (1937).An econometric approach to business cycle problems. Paris: Hermann.
 Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D., & Summers, G. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D. R. Heise (Ed.),Sociological Methodology, 1977 (pp. 84–136). San Francisco: JosseyBass.
 Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical Principles in experimental design. New York: McGrawHill.
 Title
 Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models
 Journal

Psychometrika
Volume 55, Issue 3 , pp 495515
 Cover Date
 19900901
 DOI
 10.1007/BF02294763
 Print ISSN
 00333123
 Online ISSN
 18600980
 Publisher
 SpringerVerlag
 Additional Links
 Topics
 Keywords

 Causal analysis
 covariance structure analysis
 direct effect
 indirect effect
 structural equation models
 total effect
 Industry Sectors
 Authors

 Michael E. Sobel ^{(1)}
 Author Affiliations

 1. Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, 85721, Tucson, AZ