Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The relationship between a landscape process and observed patterns can be rigorously tested only if the expected pattern in the absence of the process is known. We used methods derived from percolation theory to construct neutral landscape models,i.e., models lacking effects due to topography, contagion, disturbance history, and related ecological processes. This paper analyzes the patterns generated by these models, and compares the results with observed landscape patterns. The analysis shows that number, size, and shape of patches changes as a function of p, the fraction of the landscape occupied by the habitat type of interest, and m, the linear dimension of the map. The adaptation of percolation theory to finite scales provides a baseline for statistical comparison with landscape data. When USGS land use data (LUDA) maps are compared to random maps produced by percolation models, significant differences in the number, size distribution, and the area/perimeter (fractal dimension) indices of patches were found. These results make it possible to define the appropriate scales at which disturbance and landscape processes interact to affect landscape patterns.
- Allen, T.F.H. and Starr, T.B. 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
- Bormann, F.H. and Likens, G.E. 1979. Catastrophic disturbance and the steady state in northern hardwood forests. Amer Sci., 67: 660–669
- Burgess, R.L. and Sharpe, D.M. (eds.) 1981. Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes. Springer Verlag, New York.
- Burrough, P.A. 1983. Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation. J. Soil Sci. 34: 577–597.
- Caswell, H. 1976. Community structure: a neutral model analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 46: 327–354.
- Fegas, R.G., Claire, R.W., Guptill, S.C., Andersons K.E. and Hallam, C.A. 1983. Land use and land cover digital data. Geological Survey Circular 895-E, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia
- Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York
- Gefen, Y., Aharony, A. and Alexander, S. 1983. Anomalous diffusion on percolating clusters. Physical Rev. Lett. 50: 77–80. CrossRef
- Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., O'Neill, R.V. and Coleman, P.R. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.
- Mandelbrot, B.B. 1983. The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman, New York.
- Meentemeyer, V. and Box, E.O. 1987. Scale effects in landscape studies.In Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. pp. 15–33. Edited by M.G. Turner. Springer Verlag, New York.
- Milne, B.T. In press, (a). Hierarchical Landscape Structure and the Forest Planning Model: Discussant's Comments. U.S. Forest Forest Service.
- Milne, B.T. In press, (b). Measuring the fractal geometry of landscapes. Applied Mathematics and Computation.
- Orbach, R. 1986. Dynamics of fractal networks. Science 231: 814–819.
- Pickett, S.T.A. and White, P.S. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.
- Shugart, H.H. and West, D.C. 1981. Long-term dynamics of forest systems. Amer. Sci. 69: 647–652.
- Stauffer, D. 1985. Introduction to percolation theory. Taylor and Francis, London.
- Turner, M.G. 1987a. Land use changes and net primary production in the Georgia, USA, Landscape: 1935–82. Environ. Manage. 11: 237–247. CrossRef
- Turner, M.G., ed. 1987b. Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. Springer Verlag, New York.
- Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York.
- Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern
Volume 1, Issue 1 , pp 19-28
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- percolation theory
- landscape pattern
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 37831-6036, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
- 2. Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, 87131, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- 3. Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, 30602, Athens, GA, USA