Judging others in the shadow of suspicion
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Previous research has found that when perceivers have reason to be suspicious of the motives underlying an actor's behavior, they are likely to draw inferences about the actor's true disposition that reflect a relatively sophisticated style of attributional processing. The present research was designed to examine some of the negative consequences that suspicion can have on perceivers' judgments. In each of the three studies reported, some subjects were made suspicious about the motives of an actor on the basis of contextual information surrounding the actor's behavior, rather than the behavior itself. Results of these studies suggest that, particularly when perceivers believe that the actions or motives of the actor could affect them, suspicion may cause perceivers to see the actor in a more negative light, even if the perceivers are not convinced that the actor's behavior was indeed affected by ulterior motives.
- Allison, S. T., Mackie, D. M., Muller, M. M., & Worth, L. T. (1993).Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 151–157.
- Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. CrossRef
- Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.Psychological Review, 96, 608–630. CrossRef
- Eagly, A. H. (1987).Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Fein, S. (1991). The suspicious mind (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1991).Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(7-B).
- Fein, S., Hilton, J. L., & Miller, D. T. (1990). Suspicion of ulterior motivation and the correspondence bias.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 753–764. CrossRef
- Gilbert, D. T., & Jones, E. E. (1986). Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self-generated reality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 269–280. CrossRef
- Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., & Pelham, B. W. (1988). Of thoughts unspoken: Social inference and the self-regulation of behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 685–694. CrossRef
- Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733–740. CrossRef
- Hastie, R. (1984). Causes and effects of causal attribution.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44–56. CrossRef
- Heider, F. (1958).The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
- Hilton, J. L., & Darley, J. M. (1991). The effects of interaction goals on person perception. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 24, pp. 235–267). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Hilton, J. L., Fein, S., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Suspicion and dispositional inference.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 501–512.
- Hilton, J. L., Miller, D. T., Fein, S., & Darley, J. M. (1990). When dispositional inferences are suspended: Diagnosing and calibrating traits.Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 4, 519–537.
- Jones, E. E. (1964).Ingratiation: A social psychological analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- Jones, E. E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions.American Psychologist, 34, 107–117. CrossRef
- Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2), pp. 283–330. New York: Academic Press.
- Jones, E. E., Davis, K. E., & Gergen, K. (1961). Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 302–310.
- Jones, E. E., Worchel, S., Goethals, G. R., & Grumet, J. (1971). Prior expectancy and behavioral extremity as determinants of attitude attribution.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 59–80. CrossRef
- Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192–238.
- Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution.American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.
- Kruglanski, A. W. (1970). Attributing trustworthiness in supervisor-worker relations.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 214–232. CrossRef
- Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861–876. CrossRef
- Major, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Social stigma: The consequences of attributional ambiguity. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.),Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 345–370). San Diego: Academic Press.
- McCornack, S. A. & Levine, T. R. (1990). When lies are uncovered: Emotional and relational outcomes of discovered deception.Communication Monographs, 57, 119–138.
- Messick, D. M., & Reeder, G. D. (1972). Perceived motivation, role variations, and the attribution of personal characteristics.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 482–491. CrossRef
- Messick, D. M., & Reeder, G. D. (1974). Roles, occupations, behaviors, and attributions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 126–132. CrossRef
- Miller, D. T., Turnbull, W., & McFarland, C. (1989). When a coincidence is suspicious: The role of mental simulation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 581–589. CrossRef
- Miller, J. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961–978. CrossRef
- Neuberg, S. L. (1989). The goal of forming accurate impressions during social interactions: Attenuating the impact of negative expectancies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 374–386. CrossRef
- Neuberg, S. L., Judice, T. N., Virdin, L. M., & Carrillo, M. A. (1993). Perceiver self-presentational goals as moderators of expectancy influences: Ingratiation and the disconfirmation of negative expectancies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 409–420. CrossRef
- Reeder, G. D. (1993). Trait-behavior relations and dispositional inference.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 586–593.
- Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception.Psychological Review, 86, 61–79. CrossRef
- Reeder, G. D., Messick, D. M., & Van Avermaet, E. (1977). Dimensional asymmetry in attributional inference.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 46–57. CrossRef
- Snyder, M. (1987).Public appearances/private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: Freeman.
- Snyder, M. L., & Jones, E. E. (1974). Attitude attribution when behavior is constrained.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 585–600. CrossRef
- Strickland, L. H. (1958). Surveillance and trust.Journal of Personality, 26, 200–215.
- Strickland, L. H., Barefoot, J. C., & Hockenstein, P. (1976). Monitoring behavior in the surveillance and trust paradigm.Representative Research in Social Psychology, 7, 51–57.
- Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error.Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227–236.
- Trope, Y., Cohen, O., & Maoz, Y. (1988). The perceptual and inferential effects of situational inducements on dispositional attribution.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 165–177. CrossRef
- Weiner, B. (1985). “Spontaneous” causal thinking.Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74–84. CrossRef
- Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109–120. CrossRef
- Judging others in the shadow of suspicion
Motivation and Emotion
Volume 18, Issue 2 , pp 167-198
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors