, Volume 117, Issue 3, pp 340–357

Behavioral vigilance in rats: task validation and effects of age, amphetamine, and benzodiazepine receptor ligands


  • Jill McGaughy
    • Department of PsychologyThe Ohio State University
  • Martin Sarter
    • Department of PsychologyThe Ohio State University
Original Investigation

DOI: 10.1007/BF02246109

Cite this article as:
McGaughy, J. & Sarter, M. Psychopharmacology (1995) 117: 340. doi:10.1007/BF02246109


An operant task for the measurement of sustained attention or vigilance in rats was characterized. The task requires the animals to respond to the presentation of visual signals (presented for 25, 50, or 500 ms) by operating one lever (“hits”) and to the absence of a signal by operating the opposite lever (“correct rejection”). Incorrect responses (“misses” and “false alarms”, respectively) were not rewarded. Performance in this task is a function of signal length, i.e., the shorter the signals the higher the number of misses. An increase in “background noise” by flashing the chamber houselight (at 0.5 Hz) impaired the animals' ability to discriminate between signal and nonsignal events. Also, flashing the houselight augmented the vigilance decrement observed for shortest signals. An increase in the event-rate also resulted in a vigilance decrement. Finally, the inability of the animals to time signals was examined by testing the effects of an increase in event asynchrony. In a second experiment, the performance of differently aged rats (6- and 20 month-old male BNNia/F344 rats) was studied. Compared to young animals, 20-month-old rats showed a decrease in their ability to discriminate between shortest signals (25 ms) and non-signal events but did not differ in their ability to correctly reject nonsignal trials. Administration of the benzodiazepine receptor (BZR) agonist chlordiazepoxide (CDP; 3, 5, 8 mg/kg) resulted in an impairment of the animals' ability to discriminate between signal and non-signal events and, similar to the effects of age, this effect was exclusively due to an increase in the number of misses. CDP generally produced potent effects while affecting the aged animals to a greater degree. BZR-ligands with weak or “selective” inverse agonist properties (ZK 93426;β-CCtB) did not affect vigilance performance. The BZR partial inverse agonist RU 33965 (0.1, 0.5 mg/kg) dose-dependently impaired vigilance performance. The administration of amphetamine (0.4, 0.8 mg/kg) also impaired performance, but these impairments were possibly based on effects unrelated to attentional mechanisms. The finding that performance in this task revealed the interactions between the effects of age and BZR agonists on attentional abilities further supports the validity of measures of performance generated by this task.

Key words

AttentionVigilanceAge ChloridazepoxideZK 93426RU 33965 Amphetamine

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995