Do double-blind studies with informed consent yield externally valid results?
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Subjective and physiological effects of caffeine were investigated via a 3×2×3 design that assessed independent and interactive effects of instructions (told caffeine versus told no caffeine versus not told whether beverage contained caffeine), actual beverage content (caffeine versus no caffeine), and time after ingestion (15, 30, and 45 min). Instructions affected altertness at 15 min after ingestion. Caffeine increased alertness at 30 min after ingestion and systolic blood pressure at 30 min and 45 min after ingestion. A highly significant instruction by drug interaction on tension was obtained at all measurement points, indicating an increase in tension only among subjects who knowingly received caffeine. Because people are generally informed of drug content in non-research settings, these data challenge the external validity of typical double-blind studies, in which subjects are informed of the possibility of receiving a placebo as part of the consent procedure.
- Faden RR, Beauchamp TL (1986) A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press, New York
- Fillmore M, Vogel-Sprott M (1992) Expected effect of caffeine on motor performance predicts the type of response to placebo. Psychopharmacology 106:209–214
- Hughes JR, Gulliver SB, Amori G, Mireault GC, Fenwick JF (1989) Effect of instructions and nicotine on smoking cessation, withdrawal symptoms and self-administration of nicotine gum. Psychopharmacology 99:486–491
- Kirsch I, Weixel LJ (1988) Double-blind versus deceptive administration of a placebo. Behav Neurosci 102:319–323
- Lane JD (1983) Caffeine and cardiovascular responses to stress. Psychosom Med, 45:447–451
- Lane JD, Williams RB (1987) Cardiovascular effects of caffeine and stress in regular coffee drinkers. Psychophysiology 24:157–164
- Marlatt GA, Rohsenow DJ (1980) Cognitive processes in alcohol use: Expectancy and the balanced placebo design. In: Mello NK (ed) Advances in substance abuse: behavioral and biological research, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 159–199
- Penick SB, Fisher S (1965) Drug-set interaction: Psychological and physiological effects of epinephrine under differential expectations. Psychosom Med 27:177–182
- Penick SB, Hinkle LE (1964) The effect of expectation on response to phenmatrizine. Psychosom Med 26:369–373
- Reinsenzein R (1983). The Schachter theory of emotion: two decades later. Psychol Bull 94:239–264
- Rickels K (1986) Use of placebo in clinical trials. Psychopharmacol Bull 22:19–24
- Robertson D, Frölich JC, Carr RK, Watson JT, Hollifield JW, Shand DG, Oates JA (1978) Effects of caffeine on plasma renin activity, catecholamines and blood pressure. N Engl J Med 298:181–186
- Schachter S, Singer J (1962) Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychol Rev 69:379–399
- Wigmore ST, Hinson RE (1991) The influence of setting on consumption in the balanced placebo design. Br J Addict 86:205–215
- Do double-blind studies with informed consent yield externally valid results?
Volume 110, Issue 4 , pp 437-442
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Double-blind design
- Informed consent
- Industry Sectors