Predicting the estimated use of alternatives to incarceration
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
A greater use of sentencing alternatives to incarceration may help to reduce problems related to prison crowding and high costs of incarceration. However, a judge's ability to use these alternatives more frequently may be hindered by state sentencing policies designed to reduce judicial sentencing discretion. A study of a national random sample of 181 chief trial court judges revealed that state sentencing policies, court size, and the degree of plea bargaining in a judge's court docket are significant predictors of a judge's estimated use of alternatives to incarceration. Also, these variables are significant predictors of a judge's willingness to use alternatives for specific groups of felons constituting significant proportions of state prison populations. Consistent with the latter finding, a descriptive analysis further revealed that judges who perceive less use of alternatives for felony offenders reside predominantly in states with more crowded prisons.
- Aldrich, J., and Nelson, F. (1984).Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
- Alschuler, A. (1983). Implementing the criminal defendant's right to trial: Alternatives to the plea bargaining system.Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 50: 931–1050.
- Ball, R., and Lilly, J. (1985). Home incarceration with electronic monitoring. In Scott, J., and Hirschi, T. (eds.).Controversial Issues in Crime and Justice, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
- Blalock, H. (1978).Social Statistics, McGraw Hill, New York.
- Byrne, J. (1990). The future of intensive probation supervision and the new intermediate sanctions.Crime Delinq. 36(1): 6–41.
- Casper, J. (1972).Criminal Courts: The Defendant's Perspective, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Washington, DC.
- Diroll, D. (1989).Use of Community Corrections and the Impact of Prison and Jail Crowding on Sentencing, Ohio Governor's Office of Justice Services, Columbus.
- Eisenstein, J., and Jacob, H. (1977).Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts, Little-Brown, Boston, MA.
- Feeley, M. (1975). The effects of heavy caseloads. Paper presented at the 1975 Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
- Frank, J., Cullen, F., and Cullen, J. (1987). Sources of judicial attitudes toward criminal sanctioning.Am. J. Crime Just. 11: 151–164.
- Goldman, S. (1976).Federal Courts and a Political System, Harper and Row, New York.
- Gottfredson, S. (1983). Institutional responses to prison crowding.Rev. Law Soc. Change 12: 259–273.
- Hanushek, E., and Jackson, J. (1977).Statistical Methods for Social Scientists, Academic Press, New York.
- Heumann, M. (1978).Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges and Defense Attorneys, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Heumann, M., and Loftin, C. (1979). Mandatory sentencing and the abolition of plea bargaining: The Michigan Felony Firearms Statute.Law Soc. Rev. 13: 393.
- Hograth, J. (1971).Sentencing as a Human Process, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada.
- Holten, N., and Lamar, L. (1991).The Criminal Courts: Structures, Personnel, and Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Jacobs, J. (1980). The prisoners' rights movement and its impact, 1960–1980. In Morris, N., and Tonry, M. (eds.),Crime and Justice, Vol. 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 429–470.
- Jackson, M. (1982).Judicial Attitudes Towards Community Sentencing Options, Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services Planning and Research Branch, Ontario, Canada.
- Jankowski, L. (1992).Correctional Populations in the United States, 1990, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
- Langan, P. (1991). America's soaring prison population.Science 251: 1568–1573.
- Langbein, L., and Lichtman, C. (1978).Ecological Inference, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
- Levin, M. (1980). Urban politics and policy outcomes: The criminal courts. In Cole, G. (ed.),Criminal Justice: Law and Politics, 3rd ed., Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MA.
- Mather, L. (1979).Plea Bargaining or Trial? The Process of Criminal Case Disposition, Lexington Books, Boston, MA.
- McDonald, W. (1985).Plea Bargaining: Critical Issues and Common Practices, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
- Nagel, S. (1982). Discretion in the criminal justice system: Analyzing, channeling, reducing and controlling it.Emory Law J. 31: 603–633.
- Nardulli, P., Eisenstein, J., and Flemming, R. (1988).The Tenor of Justice: Criminal Courts and the Guilty Plea Process, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
- National Council on Crime and Delinquency (1982).California Summit Seminar on Prison Crowding, March 4, 5. and 6, 1982, Sacramento, California Final Report, Crocker National Bank Foundation, San Francisco.
- Pearson, F. (1985). New Jersey's intensive supervision program: A progress report.Crime Delinq. 31: 393–410.
- Pearson, W., and Castle, D. (1989). Alternative judicial selection devices: An analysis of Texas judges' attitudes.Judicature 73: 34–39.
- Perkins, C. (1994).National Corrections Reporting Program, 1991, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
- Petersilia, J. (1985). Probation reform. In Scott, J., and Hirschi, T. (eds.),Controversial Issues in Crime and Justice, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
- Sherman, M., and Hawkins, G. (1981).Imprisonment in America: Choosing the Future, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Singer, R. (1983). Desert sentencing and prison overcrowding: Some doubts and tentative answers.Rev. Law Soc. Change 12: 85–108.
- Snell, T. (1993).Correctional Populations in the United States, 1991, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
- Tonry, M. (1990). Stated and latent functions of ISP.Crime Delinq. 36: 174–191.
- Wooldredge, J. (1986).Structural and Cultural Sources of Variation in Guilty Plea Rates: A Study of Illinois Circuit Courts, Unpublished PhD dissertation. Department of Sociology, University of Illinois, Urbana.
- Wooldredge, J. (1989). An aggregate-level examination of the caseload pressure hypothesis.J. Quant. Criminol. 5: 259–283. CrossRef
- Wooldredge, J. (1996). Research Note: A state-level analysis of sentencing policies and inmate crowding in state prisons.Crime Delinq. 42: 456–466.
- Zimring, F., and Hawkins, G. (1991).The Scale of Imprisonment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Predicting the estimated use of alternatives to incarceration
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
Volume 13, Issue 2 , pp 121-142
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- sentencing alternatives
- chief trial court judges
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, ML 389, 600 Dyer Hall, 45221-0389, Cincinnati, Ohio
- 2. Department of Criminal Justice, Virginia Commonwealth University, 816 West Franklin Street, P.O. Box 842017, 23284, Richmond, Virginia