, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 31-58

First online:

Interpretation of sulfur cycling in two catchments in the Black Forest (Germany) using stable sulfur and oxygen isotope data

  • Bernhard MayerAffiliated withInstitut für Hydrologie, GSF Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit
  • , Karl H. FegerAffiliated withInstitut für Bodenkunde und Waidernährungslehre, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität
  • , Anette GiesemannAffiliated withInstitut für Planzenökologie, Justus Liebig Universität
  • , Hans-J. JägerAffiliated withInstitut für Planzenökologie, Justus Liebig Universität

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


The isotopic composition of SO 4 2- in bulk precipitation, canopy throughfall, seepage water at three different soil depths, stream water, and groundwater was monitored in two forested catchments in the Black Forest (Germany) between November 1989 and February 1992. Isotope measurements on aqueous sulfate were complemented by δ34S-analyses on SO2 in the air, total sulfur and inorganic sulfate in the soil, and bedrock sulfur, in order to identify sources and biogeochemical processes affecting S cycling in catchments with base poor, siliceous bedrock. Stable S isotope data indicated that atmospheric deposition and not mineral weathering is the major source of S in both catchments since δ34S-values for sulfate in the soil, in seepage water, and in stream water were generally found to be similar to the mean δ34S-values of precipitation SO 4 2- (+2.1. However, δ18O-values of seepage water SO 4 2- at 30 cm and especially at 80 cm depth were depleted by several per mil with respect to those of the atmospheric deposition (+7.5 to +13.5. This indicates that in both catchments a considerable proportion of the seepage water SO 4 2- is derived from mineralization of carbon-bonded soil S and must therefore have cycled through the organic soil S pool. δ34S-values for different S compounds in the solid soil were found to differ markedly depending on S fraction and soil depth. Since atmospheric S deposition with rather constant δ34S-values was identified as the dominant S source in both catchments, this is interpreted as a result ofin situ isotope fractionation rather than admixture of isotopically different S. The differences between the δ34S-values of seepage water and soil sulfate and those of organic soil S compounds are consistent with a model in which SO 4 2- uptake by vegetation and soil microorganisms favours34SO 4 2- slightly, whereas during mineralization of organic soil S to aqueous SOSO 4 2- ,32S reacts preferentially. However, the data provide evidence for negligible isotope fractionation during physico-chemical S transformations such as adsorption/desorption in aerated forest soils.

Key words

Catchment isotope fractionation sulfur cycling stable isotopes δ34S δ18Osulfate