Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 231–250

The context of correctness: A comment on rushton

Authors

    • Department of PsychologyUniversity of Guelph
Articles

DOI: 10.1007/BF02088001

Cite this article as:
Winston, A.S. J Soc Distress Homeless (1996) 5: 231. doi:10.1007/BF02088001

Abstract

According to Philippe Rushton, the “equalitarian fiction,” a “scientific hoax” that races are genetically equal in cognitive ability, underlies the “politically correct” objections to his research on racial differences. He maintains that there is a taboo against race unequaled by the Inquisition. I show that while Rushton has been publicly harassed, he has had continuous opportunities to present his findings in diverse, widely available, respectable journals, and no general suppression within academic psychology is evident. Similarly, Henry Garrett and his associates in the LAAEE, dedicated to preserving segregation and preventing “race suicide,” disseminated their ideas widely, although Garrett complained of the “equalitarian fiction” in 1961. Examination of the intertwined history ofMankind Quarterly, German Rassenhygiene, far right politics, and the work of Roger Pearson suggests that some cries of “political correctness” must be viewed with great caution.

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1996