Foundations of Physics

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 1589–1664

Interpretations of quantum mechanics, joint measurement of incompatible observables, and counterfactual definiteness

Authors

  • W. M. de Muynck
    • Department of Theoretical PhysicsEindhoven University of Technology
  • W. De Baere
    • Research associate N.F.W.O.
    • Laboratory for Theoretical PhysicsState University of Ghent
  • H. Martens
    • Department of Theoretical PhysicsEindhoven University of Technology
Article

DOI: 10.1007/BF02054787

Cite this article as:
de Muynck, W.M., De Baere, W. & Martens, H. Found Phys (1994) 24: 1589. doi:10.1007/BF02054787

Abstract

The validity of the conclusion to the nonlocality of quantum mechanics, accepted widely today as the only reasonable solution to the EPR and Bell issues, is questioned and criticized. Arguments are presented which remove the compelling character of this conclusion and make clear that it is not the most obvious solution. Alternative solutions are developed which are free of the contradictions related with the nonlocality conclusion. Firstly, the dependence on the adopted interpretation is shown, with the conclusion that the alleged nonlocality property of the quantum formalism may have been reached on the basis of an interpretation that is unnecessarily restrictive. Secondly, by extending the conventional quantum formalism along the lines of Ludwig and Davies it is shown that the Bell problem may be related to complementarity rather than to nonlocality. Finally, the dependence on counterfactual reasoning is critically examined. It appears that locality on the quantum level may still be retained provided one accepts a newly proposed principle of nonreproducibility at the individual quantum level as an alternative of quantum nonlocality. It is concluded that the locality principle can retain its general validity, in full conformity with all experimental data.

Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994