J. G. MANIS, Some academic influences upon publication productivity,Social Forces, 29 (1951) 267.
D. LINDSEY,The Scientific Publication System in Social Science, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1978.
B. T. SHAW,The Use of Quality and Quantity of Publications as, Criteria for Evaluating Scientists, Agriculture Research Service, USDA Miscellaneous Publication No. 1041, Washington, D. C., U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1967.
N. D. GLENN, W. VILLEMEZ, The productivity of sociologists in 45 American universities.American Sociologist, 5 (1970) 244.
L. L. HARGENS,Patterns of Scientific Research: A Comparative Analysis of Research in Three Scientific Fields, Washington, D. C., The American Sociological Association, 1975, p. 87.
H. W. MENARD,Science: Growth and Change, New York, Harper and Row, 1971.
D. CRANE,Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1972.
N. C. MULLINS, The development of specialties in social science: the case of ethnomethodology,Science Studies, 3 (1973) 245.
N. C. MULLINS, New causal theory: An elite specialty in social sciences,History of Political Economy, 7 (1975) 499.
S. COLE, The growth of scientific knowledge: theories of deviance as a case study, In:The Idea of Social Structure, L. COSER (Ed.), New York, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1976.
L. FREESE, Cumulative sociological knowledge,American Sociological Review, 37 (1972) 472.
T. PARSONS,Essays in Sociological Theory, (re. ed.) New York, Free Press, 1954.
G. J. STIGLER, The pattern of citation practices in economics. inThe Economist as Preacher and Other Essays, 173–191, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1982.
D. LINDSEY, Assessing precision in the manuscript review process: a little better than a dice roll,Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 61.
H. F. MOED, W. J. M. BURGER, J. G. FRANKFORT, A. F. J. Van RAAN, The use of bibliometric data for measurement of university research performanceResearch Policy, 14 (1985) 131.
R. E. QUANDT, Some quantitative aspects of the economics journal literature.Journal of Political Economy, 84 (1976) 741.
H. A. ZUCKERMAN,The Scientific Elite, New York, Free Press, 1977.
E. GARFIELD,Citation Indexing-its Theory and Applications in Science, Technology, and Humanities, New York, Wiley, 1979.
A. J. DIAMOND, JR. What is a citation worth?The Journal of Human Resources, 21 (1986) 200.
J. COLE, S. COLE,Social Stratification in Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973, p. 21.
M. KOCHEN, B. PERKEL, Improving referee-selection and manuscript evaluation, in:Proceedings of the First International Conference of Scientific Editors, J. McCARTNEY (Ed.), April 24–29, 1977, Jerusalem, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1977, p. 1.
E. GARFIELD, The most-cited life science articles highlight AIDS research,Current Contents, 49 (1986) 3.
M. J. MAHONEY, Open exchange and epistemic progress,American Psychologist, 40 (1985) 29.
E. GARFIELD, The most-cited 1983 chemistry articles focus on NMR but the increasing impact of materials science and computer methods is evident,Current Contents, 51-52 (1986) 3.
T. KUHN,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1962.
G. HOLTON, Can science be measured? In:Toward a Metric of Science, Y. ELKANA and others (Eds), New York, Wiley-Interscience, 1978.
B. GRIFFITH, H. G. SMALL,A Philadelphia study of structure of science: The structure of social and behavioral science literature, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Social Studies of Science, Ithaca, New York November 4–6, 1976.
E. GARFIELD, The 250 most-cited primary authors 1961–1975. Part 3: Each authors's most-cited publication,Current Contents, 51 (1977) 5.
J. WIENER, The footnote fetish,Telos, 31 (1977) 172, p. 174.
H. M. BEVILLE, Jr.Audience Ratings: Radio, Television and Cable, Hillsdale, N. J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher, 1985.
A. C. NIELSEN,What Do the Ratings Really Say? Chicago, A. C. Nielsen, 1964.
L. MEYERS, On the reliability of the ratings,Television Quarterly, 1 (1962) 50.
M. H. MACROBERTS, B. R. MACROBERTS, Quantitative measures of communication in science: A study of the formal level,Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986) 151.
D. DIEKS, H. CHANG, Differences in impact of scientific publications: Some indices derived from a citation analysis.Social Studies of Science, 6 (1976) 247.
M. J. MORAVCSIK, P. MURUGESAN, Some results on the function and quality of citations,Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 86.
M. J. MULKAY, Norms and ideology in science,Social Science Information, 15 (1976) 637.
R. A. ROTHMAN, A dissenting view on the scientific ethos,British Journal of Sociology, 23 (1972) 102.
J. LAW, Theories and methods in the sociology of science: an interpretive approach,Social Science Information 13 (1974) 163.
M. JAY,The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–50, Boston, Little, Brown, 1973.
F. CUNNINGHAM,Objectivity in Social Science, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1973.
R. POOLE,Toward Deep Subjectivity, Middlesex, England, Penguin Books, 1972., p. 12.
R. S. LECKER, Whose side are we on?Social Problems, 14 (1967) 239.
R. S. LYNN,Knowledge for What? Boston, Grove Press, 1938.
M. POLANYI,Personal Knowledge, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1958.
E. GARFIELD, The 250 most-cited autors in the Arts and Humanities Citation Index, 1976–1983,Current Contents 48 (1986) 3.
M. J. MAHONEY, Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system,Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1 (1977) 161.
T. S. KUHN,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1962.
B. F. RESKIN, Sex differences in status attainment in science: the case of the postdoctoral fellowship,American Sociological Review, 42 (1977) 491.
M. H. MACROBERTS, B. R. MACROBERTS, Testing the Ortega Hypothesis: Facts and artifacts,Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 293. Also see the comments and discussions of others regarding this paper in this same issue.
A. V. CICOUREL,Method and Measurement in Sociology, New York, Free Press, 1964.