A comparison of maximum cystometric bladder capacity with maximum environmental voided volumes
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The aim of the study was, to determine whether maximum cystometric capacity accurately reflects the maximum functional bladder volume in women with urinary incontinence. We performed a retrospective chart review involving 85 women between the ages of 22 and 89 with primary complaints of urinary incontinence. The maximum cystometric capacity as determined by cystometry was compared with the maximum environmental voided volumes as recorded in a 24-hour voiding diary, using Pearson's correlation coefficients and pairedt-tests. Patients diagnosed as having a small bladder capacity (<300 ml maximum volume) based on cystometry were also examined with contingency table analysis to determine whether the bladder volumes in the voiding diaries supported the diagnosis of a small bladder. In 85 subjects the average maximum cystometric capacity was 14.7% less than the maximum volume recorded in the voiding diary. The correlation between the maximum cystometric capacity and maximum functional bladder volume wasr=0.473 (P<0.001). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the two volumes by pairedt-test analysis (P=0.006). Using cystometry to diagnose small bladder capacity showed a sensitivity of 62.9% and a specificity of 71.2% when using voiding diary volumes as the criterion standard. The positive predictive value was 51.4% and the negative predictive value was 84.0%. These results suggest that whereas the maximum bladder capacity measured by cystometry correlates with maximum environmental bladder capacity as determined by 24-hour voiding diaries, there is a statistically significant difference. The diagnosis of a small bladder should not be based on office cystometry alone.
Editorial Comment: Although voiding diaries provide a wealth of information regarding daily intake and voiding habits, including episodes of incontinence, they can be difficult to obtain from all patients. The authors question whether a cystometrogram can provide adequate information regarding bladder capacity, and in particular identify low-capacity bladders which would require further evaluation. The answer in their population seems to be no. That this would be the case is not completely surprising, given the artificial environment of the urodynamic laboratory from many standpoints, as enumerated by the authors. The voiding diary should be used to establish functional bladder capacity and cystometry to evaluate bladder sensation, compliance and uncontrolled detrusor activity.
Torrens M, Abrams P. Cystometry.Urol Clin North Am 1979;6:79–85PubMed
Wyman J, Choi S, Harkins S et al. The urinary diary in the evaluation of incontinent women: a test-retest analysis.Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:812–817PubMed
Heit M, Brubaker L. Clinical correlates in patients not completing a voiding diary.Int Urogynecol J 1996;7:256–259CrossRef
Diokno AC, Wells TJ, Brink CA. Comparison of self-reported voided volume with cystometric bladder capacity.Urol Neurol Urodyn 1987;137:698–700
Abrams P, Blavis JG, Stanton SL, Anderson JT. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function.Int Urogynecol J 1990;1:45–58CrossRef
Langer R, Ron-El R, Newman M, Herman A, Caspi E. Detrusor instability following colposuspension for urinary incontinence.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95:607–609PubMed
Ouslander J, Leach G, Staskin D et al. Prospective evaluation of an assessment strategy for geriatric urinary incontinence.J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37:715–724PubMed
Cass AS, Ward BD, Markland C. Comparison of slow and rapid fill cystometry using liquid and air.J Urol 1970;104:104–108PubMed
Jensen JK. Urodynamic evaluation. In: Ostergard DR, Bent AE, eds. Urogynecology and urodynamics, 4th edn. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1991:116–121
Jensen JK. Urodynamic evaluation. In: Ostergard DR, Bent AE, eds. Urogynecology and urodynamics, 4th edn. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1991;115.
- A comparison of maximum cystometric bladder capacity with maximum environmental voided volumes
International Urogynecology Journal
Volume 9, Issue 2 , pp 78-82
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- 24-Hour Voiding Diary
- Industry Sectors