Authors Of Articles

Journal of Classification

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 193-218

First online:

Comparing partitions

  • Lawrence HubertAffiliated withGraduate School of Education, The University of California
  • , Phipps ArabieAffiliated withDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


The problem of comparing two different partitions of a finite set of objects reappears continually in the clustering literature. We begin by reviewing a well-known measure of partition correspondence often attributed to Rand (1971), discuss the issue of correcting this index for chance, and note that a recent normalization strategy developed by Morey and Agresti (1984) and adopted by others (e.g., Miligan and Cooper 1985) is based on an incorrect assumption. Then, the general problem of comparing partitions is approached indirectly by assessing the congruence of two proximity matrices using a simple cross-product measure. They are generated from corresponding partitions using various scoring rules. Special cases derivable include traditionally familiar statistics and/or ones tailored to weight certain object pairs differentially. Finally, we propose a measure based on the comparison of object triples having the advantage of a probabilistic interpretation in addition to being corrected for chance (i.e., assuming a constant value under a reasonable null hypothesis) and bounded between ±1.


Measures of agreement Measures of association Consensus indices