Skip to main content
Log in

Arm anomalies: cases of supernumerary development and bilateral agenesis of arm pairs in Octopoda (Mollusca, Cephalopoda)

  • Published:
Zoomorphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The first case of true hexapody among the Octopoda, resulting from bilateral agenesis of one arm pair, is described for a malePteroctopus tetracirrhus. A case of decapody, with uniform development of all arms, is also reported for the first time for a maleOctopus briareus. Both conditions apparently result from developmental anomalies of the embryonic arm anlagen. A survey of other anomalous conditions relating to arm development and regeneration within the Cephalopoda is provided. A possible relationship of polyfurcation of arm tips in the Octopoda with regenerative processes in amphibian limbs leading to similar conditions is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appellöf A (1892) Teuthologische Beiträge IV. über einem Fall von doppelseitiger Hectokotylisation beiEledone cirrosa (Lam.) d'Orb. Bergs Mus Aarsb 1892:14–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JM (1965) Normal embryonic stages of the squid,Loligo pealei (Lesueur). Biol Bull 128:24–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JM, Williams-Arnold LD (1977) Cephalopoda: Decapoda. In: Giese AC, Pearse JS (eds) Reproduction of marine invertebrates, vol IV. Molluscs: Gastropods and cephalopds. Academic Press, New York, pp 243–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant SV, Iten LE (1976) Supernumerary limbs in amphibians: experimental prodution inNotophthalmus viridescens and a new interpretation of their formation. Dev Biol 50:212–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorini P (1978) Cephalopoda Tintenfische. Morphogenese der Tiere. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, 181 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleadall IG (1989) An octopus with only seven arms: anatomical details. J Moll Stud 55:479–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanko B (1913) über den gespaltenen Arm einesOctopus vulgaris. Arch Entwickl.-Mech Org 37(3): 217–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Joubin L (1898) Cephalopods recueillis au cours des croisieres de S.A.S. le Prince de Monaco. 5e Note.Moschites verrucosa (Verrill). Bull Inst Monaco No. 339:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumph HE (1960) Arm abnormality inOctopus. Nature 185:334–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange MM (1920) On the regeneration and finer structure of the arms of the cephalopods. J Exp Zool 31(1): 1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Maden M, Mustafa K (1982) The structure of 180‡ supernumerary limbs and a hypothesis of their formation. Dev Biol 93:257–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Naef A (1923) Die Cephalopoden (Systematik). Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte, Monograph 25, part I, vol I, fasc II. R. Friedlander, Berlin, pp 313–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Naef A (1928) Die Cephalopoden (Embryologie). Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte, Monograph 25, part II. R. Friedlander, Berlin, 357 PP

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada YK (1935) An octopus with branched arms and mode of branching. Annot Zool Japon 15:5–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada YK (1937) An occurrence of branched arms in the decapod cephalopod,Sepia esculenta Hoyle. Annot Zool Japon 17(1):93–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada YK (1965a) On Japanese octopuses with branched arms, with special reference to their captures from 1884 to 1964. Proc Jap Acad 41(7):618–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada YK (1965b) Rule of arm-branching in Japanese octopuses with branched arms. Proc Jap Acad 41(7):624–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacio F (1973) On the double hectocotylization of octopods. Nautilus 87(4):99–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Parona C (1900) Sulla dichotomia delle braccia nei Cefalopodi. Boll Mus Zool Anat Comp Univ Genova, vol 4 [= No. 96]:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson GC (1929a) Notes on the Cephalopoda. — IX. Remarks on Atlantic Octopoda &c. in the Zoologisch Museum, Amsterdam, Ann Mag Natur Hist Ser 10, 3(18):609–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson GC (1929b) On a case of bilateral hectocotylization inOctopus rugosus. Proc Zool Soc Lond (1929):95–97

  • Sasaki M (1929) The Cephalopoda of Japanese and adjacent seas. J Coll Agric Hokkaido Imp Univ No. 20 (suppl No. 1), 357 pp

  • Smith EA (1907) Notes on an “Octopus” with branching arms. Ann Mag Natur Hist (7) 20:407–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Tank PW, Holder N (1981) Pattern regulation in the regenerating limbs of urodele amphibians. Quart Rev Biol 56:113–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss GL (1971) Cephalopods collected by the R/V John Elliott Pillsbury in the Gulf of Panama in 1967. Bull Mar Sci 21(1):1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells MJ, Wells J (1977) Cephalopoda: Octopodia. In: Giese AC, Pearse JS (eds) Reproduction of marine invertebrates vol 4, Molluscs: Gastropods and cephalopods. Academic Press, New York, pp 291–336

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toll, R.B., Binger, L.C. Arm anomalies: cases of supernumerary development and bilateral agenesis of arm pairs in Octopoda (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Zoomorphology 110, 313–316 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01668021

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01668021

Keywords

Navigation