Processes operative during delay of gratification
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Sixty-four middle-class preschool children chose between waiting for a preferred item and receiving a less desired item immediately. The items were of different classes, i.e., one food and one toy, and subjects waited with one, both, or neither of the rewards available for viewing. The likelihood that a subject would continue waiting for the delayed reward was found to increase as a function of previous waiting time rather than decrease or remain constant as required by two current theories of delay of gratification processes, an aversive affect model implied by Mischel and Ebbesen (1970) and Atkinson and Birch's (1970) “dynamics of action.” Although display of rewards impaired successful delay, replicating previous results, dynamics of action predictions of differential effects for display of immediately available and delayed outcomes of different classes were not confirmed. Systematic observation of spontaneous subject activities during the delay period offered additional support for the notion that distraction facilitates successful waiting behavior. A decision-attention model is proposed to account for the present results as well as those of previous studies of delay of gratification.
- Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D.The dynamics of action. New York: Wiley, 1970.
- Birch, D., & Atkinson, J. W. Comments on the discussion. In B. Weiner (Ed.),Cognitive views of human motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1974. Pp. 71–84.
- Corfield, V., Al-Issa, I., & Johnson, B. Effects of verbal cues on the delay of self-gratification.Journal of Psychology 1976,94 167–171.
- Fishburn, P. C.Utility theory and decision-making. New York: Wiley, 1970.
- Jamison, D. Studies in individual choice behavior.RAND Memorandum No. P-4255. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation, 1970.
- Miller, D. T., & Karniol, R.Children's cognitive re-evaluations in a self-control situation: A test of the self-persuasion hypothesis. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, March 1977.
- Mischel, W. Cognitive appraisals and transformations in self-control. In B. Weiner (Ed.),Cognitive views of human motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1974. Pp. 33–49. (a)
- Mischel, W. Processes in delay of gratification. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1974. (b)
- Mischel, W., & Baker, N. Cognitive appraisals and transformations in delay behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,31 254–261.
- Mischel, W., & Ebbesen, E. B. Attention in delay of gratification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,16 329–337.
- Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E. B., & Zeiss, A. Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,21 204–218.
- Mischel, W., & Moore, B. Effects of attention to symbolically presented rewards on self-control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973,28, 172–179.
- Mischel, W., & Underwood, B. Instrumental ideation in delay of gratification.Child Development 1974,45 1083–1088.
- Moore, B. S., Clyburn, A., & Underwood, B. The role of affect in delay of gratification.Child Development 1976,47 273–276.
- Schwarz, J. C., & Pollack, P. R. Affect and delay of gratification.Journal of Research in Personality 1977,11 147–164.
- Processes operative during delay of gratification
Motivation and Emotion
Volume 3, Issue 2 , pp 103-115
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors