Abstract
From the hypothesis that all Turing closed games are determined we prove: (1) the Continuum Hypothesis and (2) every subset of ℵ1 is constructible from a real.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davis, M.: Infinite games of perfect information. Ann. Math. Stud.52, 85–101 (1964)
Friedman, H.: Determinateness in the low projective hierarchy. Fundam. Math.77, 79–95 (1971)
Friedman, H.: Higher set theory and mathematical practice. Ann. Math. Logic2, 326–357 (1971)
Harrington, L.: Analytic determinacy and 0#. J. Symb. Logic43, 685–693 (1978)
Jech, T.: Set theory. New York: Academic Press 1978
Martin, D.: Measurable cardinals and analytic games. Fundam. Math.66, 287–291 (1970)
Martin, D.: Borel determinacy. Ann. Math. II Ser.102, 363–371 (1975)
Moschovakis, Y.: Descriptive set theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1980
Mycielsky, J.: On the axiom of determinateness. Fundam. Math.53, 205–224 (1964)
Sacks, G.: Higher recursion theory. Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo: Springer (in press)
Solovay, R.: A model of set theory in which every set is Lebesgue measurable. Ann. Math. II Ser.92, 1–56 (1970)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sami, R.L. Turing determinacy and the continuum hypothesis. Arch Math Logic 28, 149–154 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01622874
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01622874