Osteoporosis International

, Volume 4, Issue 6, pp 368–381

Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: Synopsis of a WHO report

  • J. A. Kanis
  • J. A. Kanis
Who Study Document

DOI: 10.1007/BF01622200

Cite this article as:
Kanis, J.A. & Kanis, J.A. Osteoporosis Int (1994) 4: 368. doi:10.1007/BF01622200


The criteria required for an effective screening strategy for osteoporosis are largely met in Caucasian women. The disease is common and readily diagnosed by the measurement of bone mineral with single- or dual-energy absorptiometry. Such measurements have high specificity but lower sensitivity, so that the value of the technique is greater for those identified as being at higher risk. Against this background there is little evidence that osteoporosis can usefully be tackled by a public health policy to influence risk factors such as smoking, exercise and nutrition. This suggests that it is appropriate to consider targetting of treatment with agents affecting bone metabolism to susceptible individuals. Since the main benefits of the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are probably on cardiovascular morbidity, the major role for selective screening is to direct non-HRT interventions. An appropriate time to consider screening and intervention is at the menopause, but screening at later ages is also worthy of consideration. Since the cost of screening is low and that of bone-active drugs is high, the selective use of screening techniques will improve the cost-benefit ratio of intervention.


Bone mineral measurement Fractures Osteoporosis Screening 

Copyright information

© European Foundation for Osteoporosis 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Kanis
    • 1
  • J. A. Kanis
    • 1
  1. 1.WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Disease, Department of Human Metabolism and Clinical BiochemistryUniversity of Sheffield Medical SchoolSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations