Effective practices in design transfer
- J. S. Busby
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The notion of transferring existing design solutions to new design problems is a basic one. Transfer provides a means of tackling increasing complexity, of limiting risks and costs, and of capitalizing on experience. In practice, in design organizations, it can be hard to judge the outcome of transfer because there can be several, often obscure benefits and drawbacks. This work is therefore an attempt to identify effective practices towards transfer on the part of designers and design managers. It is based on a qualitative analysis of 50 unstructured interviews carried out with members of two commercial design organizations. The practices were classified inductively in 15 main categories, of which the most heavily populated were associativity-improving, criteria-broadening, effort-reducing, environment-influencing, error-averting and motivation-addressing. The results have both a practical relevance (since most of the effective practices could be readily taught to novice designers) and a more theoretical relevance (showing what designers believe makes design transfer problematic).
- Lawson B (1990). How Designers Think. Butterworth Architecture, London, p. 2.
- Condoor SS, Shankar SR, Brock HR, Burger CP and Jansson DG (1992). A cognitive framework for the design process. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Scottsdale, AR, 13–16 September, 277–281.
- Guindon R (1990). Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 305–344.
- Jansson DG and SM Smith (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3–11.
- Singley MK and Anderson JR (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Gentner D (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogitive Science, 7, 155–170.
- Carroll JM and Mack RL (1985). Metaphor, computer systems, and active learning. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, 39–57.
- Lave J (1988). Cognition in Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
- Woodfield SN, Embley DW and Scott DT (1987). Can programmers reuse software? IEEE Software, July, 52–60.
- Geary K (1988). The practicalities of introducing largescale software re-use. Software Engineering Journal, 3, 172–176.
- Lenz M, Schmid HA and Wolf PF (1987). Software reuse through building blocks. IEEE Software, July, 34–51.
- Jackson D and Jackson M (1996). Problem decomposition for reuse. Software Engineering Journal, 11, 19–30.
- Banker RD, Kauffman RJ and Zweig D (1993). Repository evaluation of software reuse. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19, 379–389.
- Burton BA, Aragon RW, Bailey SW, Koehler KD and Mayes LA (1987). The reusable software library. IEEE Software, July, 25–33.
- Busby JS (1998). Causal explanations of the absence of reuse in engineering design organizations. Proc. Engineering Design Conference EDC'98, Brunel University, London 23–25 June, 475–482.
- Mili H, Mili F and Mili A (1995). Reusing software: issues and research directions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(6), 528–562.
- Sycara KP and Navinchandra D (1989). Integrating case-based reasoning and qualitative reasoning in engineering design. In Gero JS (ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Design, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 321–350.
- Effective practices in design transfer
Research in Engineering Design
Volume 10, Issue 3 , pp 178-188
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- J. S. Busby (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Industrial and Manufacturing Science, Cranfield University, Building 37, MK43 0AL, Cranfield, Beds, UK