Reicher MA, Rauschning W, Gold RH, et al. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint: normal anatomy.Am J Roentgenol 1985;145: 895–902.
Mackenzie R, Logan BM, Shah NJ, et al. Direct anatomical-MRI correlation: the knee.Surg Radiol Anat 1994;16: 183–192.
Fischer SP, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, et al. Accuracy of diagnosis from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: a multi centre analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients.J Bone Joint Surg 1991;73A: 2–10.
Mackenzie R, Hollingworth W, Dixon AK. Quality of life assessments in the evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging.Qual Life Res 1994;3: 29–37.
Teasdale GM, Hadley DM, Laurence A, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in suspected lesions in the posterior cranial fossa.BMJ 1989;299:349–355.
Szczepura AK, Fletcher J, Fitz-Patrick JD. Cost effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in the neurosciences.BMJ 1991;303: 1435–1439.
Dixon AK, Southern JP, Teale A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the head and spine: effective for the clinician or the patient?BMJ 1991;302: 79–82.
Dixon AK, Wheeler TK, Lomas D, Mackenzie R. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for axillary symptoms following treatment of breast carcinoma? A randomised trialClin Radiol 1993;48: 371–376.
Mackenzie R, Lomas DJ, Villar RN, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the problem knee: A randomised clinical trial.Br J Radiol 1993;66 (Suppl.): 21.
Rosser R, Kind P. A scale of valuations of states of illness is there a social consensus?Int J Epidemiol 1978;7: 347–358.
Gudex C, Kind P.The QALY Toolkit. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 1988. [Discussion paper 38].
Kind P, Gudex CM. Measuring health status in the community: a comparison of methods.J Epidemiol Community Health 1994;48: 86–91.
Spiegelhalter DJ, Gore SM, Fitzpatrick T, et al. Quality of life measures in health care. III: resource allocation.BMJ 1992;305: 1205–1209.
Carr-Hill RA. Assumptions of the QALY procedure.Soc Sci Med 1989;29: 469–477.
Donaldson C, Atkinson A, Bond J, Wright K. Should QALYs be program specific.J Health Econ 1988;7: 239–257.
Gore SM. Statistics in question. In: Gore SM, Altman DGStatistics in practice London: British Medical Association, 1982: 27–94.
Goin JE, Hermann GA. The clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging evaluation studies: problems, paradigms and prescriptions.Invest Radiol 1991;26: 507–511.
Todd C, Bradley C. The design and development of psychological scales. In: Bradley C, ed.Handbook of psychology and diabetes: A guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic, 1994; 15–42.
Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.J Chron Dis 1987;40: 171–178.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form health survey (SF-36).Med Care 1992;30: 473–482.
Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A.Quality of life measurement in health care: A review of measures and population norms for the UK SF-36. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit, 1993.
EuroQol© Group. EuroQol©—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.Health Policy 1990;16: 199–208.
Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.BMJ 1992;305: 160–164.
Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, et al. The SF 36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?BMJ 1993;306: 1440–1444.
Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Garratt AM, et al. SF 36 health survey questionnaire: I. Reliabiliity in two patient based studies.Quality in Health Care 1994;3: 180–185.
Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Russell IT. SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinicial conditions.Quality in Health Care 1994;3: 186–192.
Kind P. Practical and methodological issues in the development of the EuroQol: The York experience. In: Albrecht GL and Fitzpatrick R, eds.Advances in medical sociology Vol 5: Quality of Life. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, 1995; 219–253.
Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek BSF-36 Health survey. Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 1993.
Interim values provided by the Research Group on the Measurement and Valuation of Health (MVH group), University of York [Personal communication, MVH Group, June 1994]
Kind P, Gudex C.The HMQ: measuring health status in the community. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 1991 [Discussion paper no. 93]
Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF 36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age.BMJ 1993;306: 1437–1440.
University of York,Mimeo. ‘The Measurement and valuation of health’. May 1994.
Williams A, Kind P. The present state of play about QALYs. In: Hopkins A, ed.Measures of the quality of life, and the uses to which such measures may be put. London: RCP publications, 1992; 21–33.
Brazier J, Jones N, Kind P. Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire.Qual Life Res 1993;2: 169–180.
Lydick E, Epstein RS. Interpretation of quality of life changes.Qual Life Res 1993;2: 221–226.
Hurst NP, Jobanputra P, Hunter M, et al. Validity of EuroQol—A generic health status instrument—in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Br J Rheumatol 1994;33: 655–662.