Extradyadic romantic involvement: Moderating effects of sociosexuality and gender
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In two separate experiments, the role of both sociosexuality (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991) and gender in moderating individuals' tendencies to pursue extradyadic relationships was examined. Unmarried subjects, predominantly Anglo and Hispanic, reportedly in “exclusive” dating relationships were presented with opportunities to become involved in a romantic relationship across a variety of situations. Their willingness to disregard both their own involved relationship status as well as their potential partner's current relationship status was assessed. Across experiments, individuals with an unrestricted sociosexual orientation indicated a greater willingness to pursue extradyadic involvement as evidenced by both self-report (Experiments 1 and 2) and behavioral (Experiment 2) measures. Further, on self-report measures, men indicated a greater willingness than did women to pursue extradyadic involvement. Gender differences disappeared on the behavioral measure. Finally, across experiments, subjects were less likely to pursue potential partners who were described as currently involved (versus uninvolved). This latter factor failed to interact with either sociosexuality or gender. Results are discussed from both evolutionary and cultural-contingency perspectives. Implications for practitioners are also presented.
- Byers, E. S., & Lewis, K. (1988). Dating couples' disagreements over the desired level of sexual intimacy.The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 15–29.
- Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.
- Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559–570.
- Clark, R. D. (1990). The impact of AIDS on gender differences in willingness to engage in casual sex.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 771–782.
- Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers.Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39–55.
- Cunningham, M. R. (1989). Reactions to heterosexual opening gambits: Female selectivity and male responsiveness.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 27–41.
- Downey, J. L., & Vitulli, W. F. (1987). Self-report measures of behavioral attributions related to interpersonal flirtation situations.Psychological Reports, 61, 899–904.
- Eysenck, H. J. (1974). Personality, premarital sexual permissiveness and assortative mating.Journal of Sex Research, 10, 47–51.
- Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., White, L. A., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality.Journal of Sex Research, 25, 123–151.
- Gayford, J. J. (1979). Battered wives.British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 22, 496–503.
- Griffitt, W., & Hatfield, E. (1985).Human Sexual Behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
- Hill, C., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs.Journal of Social Issues, 32, 147–168.
- Hansen, G. L. (1987). Extradyadic relations during courtship.Journal of Sex Research, 23, 382–390.
- Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1990).Love, Sex & Intimacy. Harper Collins. New York: College Publishers.
- Jesser, C. J. (1978). Male responses to direct verbal sexual initiatives of females.Journal of Sex Research, 14, 118–128.
- Lieberman, B. (1988). Extrapremarital intercourse: Attitudes toward a neglected behavior.The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 291–299.
- Lund, M. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 3–23.
- Maticka-Tyndale, E. (1992). Social construction of HIV transmission and prevention among heterosexual young adults.Social Problems, 39, 238–252.
- McCormick, N. B., Brannigan, G. G., & LaPlante, M. N. (1984). Social desirability in the bedroom: Role of approval motivation in sexual relationships.Sex Roles, 11, 303–314.
- Roscoe, B., Cavanaugh, L. E., & Kennedy, D. R. (1988). Dating infidelity: behaviors, reasons and consequences.Adolescence, 23, 35–42.
- Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1989). Young singles' scripts for a first date.Gender and Society, 3, 258–268.
- Rubin, Z., Peplau, L. A., & Hill, C. T. (1981). Loving and leaving: Sex differences in romantic attachments.Sex Roles, 7, 821–835.
- Seal, D. W. (April, 1992).Attraction: Do I take that dare? Presentation to the Southwestern Psychological Association's annual conference. Austin, TX.
- Seal, D. W. (Manuscript in progress).Safe sex behavior in young adult relationships. University of New Mexico.
- Seal, D. W., & Agostinelli, G. (1994). Individual differences associated with high-risk sexual behaviour: Implications for intervention programmes.AIDS Care, 6(4), 393–397.
- Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.
- Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice.Journal of Personality, 60, 31–51.
- Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.
- Snyder, M., Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1986). Personality and sexual relations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 181–190.
- Stets, J., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships.Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 237–246.
- Tellegen, A. (1982).Brief manual of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. University of Minnesota.
- Thompson, A. P. (1983). Extramarital sex: A review of the research literature.The Journal of Sex Research, 19, 1–22.
- Thompson, A. P. (1984). Emotional and sexual components of extramarital relations.Journal of Marriage and Family, 46, 35–42.
- Woodcock, A. J., Stenner, K., & Ingham, R. (1992). Young people talking about HIV and AIDS: Interpretations of personal risk of infection.Health Education Research, 7, 229–247.
- Extradyadic romantic involvement: Moderating effects of sociosexuality and gender
Volume 31, Issue 1-2 , pp 1-22
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors