Voluntary control of penile tumescence among homosexual and heterosexual subjects
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Voluntary control of erectile responses represents a major threat to the validity of penile plethysmography. This study was designed to determine whether individuals can mimic a sexual orientation that differs from their actual sexual orientation. Since the presumed mechanism underlying voluntary control of penile tumescence involves a shift in attentional focus, a recall test was employed to assess the relationship between the ability to influence erectile responses and recall of critical test stimuli. Homosexual and heterosexual subjects were exposed to sexual materials under standard and “faking” instructions. The faking instructions consisted of asking subjects to suppress erectile responses to preferred stimuli and to enhance penile tumescence in the presence of nonpreferred stimuli. Across groups, results revealed some degree of suppression of erections but no significant enhancement of erections. Self-reported cognitive arousal under both conditions was consistent with erectile data. However, subjects' perceived control over erectile responses tended to be greater than their actual performance. No significant differences in recall were obtained. The recall procedure appears to interfere with subjects' ability to control erectile responses. Implications for clinical applications of penile plethysmography are summarized with suggestions for future research.
- Abel, G. G., Barlow, D. H., Blanchard, E. B., and Mavissakalian, M. (1975). Measurement of sexual arousal in male homosexuals: Effects of instructions and stimulus modality.Arch. Sex. Behav. 4: 623–629.
- Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Murphy, W. D., and Flanagan, B. (1981). Identifying dangerous child molesters. In Stuart, R. B. (ed.),Violent Behavior: Social Learning Approaches to Prediction, Management and Treatment Brunner/Mazel, New York.
- Abel, G. G., Blanchard, E. B., and Barlow, D. H. (1981). Measurement of sexual arousal in several paraphilias: The effects of stimulus modality, instructional set and stimulus content on the objective. Behav. Res. Ther. 19: 25–33.
- Avery-Clark, C. A., and Laws, D. R. (1984). Differential erection response patterns of sexual child abusers to stimuli describing activities with children.Behav. Ther. 15: 71–83.
- Bancroft, J. H. J., Jones, H. G., and Pullan, B. R. (1966). A simple transducer for measuring penile erection with comments on its use in the treatment of sexual disorder.Behav. Res. Ther. 4: 230–241.
- Earls, C. M., and Marshall, W. L. (1983). The current state of technology in the laboratory assessment of sexual arousal patterns. In Greer, J. G., and Stuart, I. R. (eds.),The Sexual Aggressor: Current Perspectives on Treatment Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
- Farkas, G. M. (1978). Comments on Levin et al. and Rosen and Kopel: Internal and external validity issues.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46: 1515–1516.
- Freund, K. (1961). Laboratory differential diagnosis of homo- and heterosexuality: An experiment with faking.Rev. Czech, Med. 7: 20–31.
- Freund, K. (1963). A laboratory method for diagnosing predominance of homo- and hetero-erotic interest in the male.Behav. Res. Ther. 1: 85–93.
- Freund, K. (1967a). Diagnosing homo- or heterosexuality and erotic age-preference by means of a psychophysiological test.Behav. Res. Ther. 5: 209–228.
- Freund, K. (1967b). Erotic preference in pedophilia.Behav. Res. Ther. 5: 339–348.
- Freund, K., Chan, S., and Coulthard, R. (1979). Phallometric diagnosis with “nonadmitters.”Behav. Res. Ther. 17: 451–457.
- Freund, K., Langevin, R., Cibiri, S., and Zajac, Y. (1973). Heterosexual aversion in homosexual males.Br. J. Psychiat. 122: 163–169.
- Freund, K., Langevin, R., and Zajac, Y. (1974). Heterosexual aversion in homosexual males: A second experiment.Br. J. Psychiat. 125: 177–180.
- Freund, K., Langevin, R., Wescom, T., and Zajac, Y. (1975). Heterosexual interests in homosexual males.Arch. Sex. Behav. 4: 509–518.
- Freund, K., Watson, R., and Rienzo, D. (1988). Signs of feigning in the phallometric test.Behav. Res. Ther. 26: 105–112.
- Hall, G. C. N., Proctor, W. C., and Nelson, G. M. (1988). Validity of physiological measures of pedophilic sexual arousal in a sexual offender population.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56: 118–122.
- Henson, D. E., and Rubin, H. B. (1971). Voluntary control of eroticism.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 4: 37–44.
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin, C. E. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male W. B. Sanders, Philadelphia.
- Krisak, J., Murphy, W. D., and Stalgaitis, S. (1981). Reliability issues in the penile assessment of incarcerants.J. Behav. Assess. 3: 199–207.
- Laws, D. R., and Holmen, M. L. (1978). Sexual response faking by pedophiles.Crim. Justice Behav. 5: 343–356.
- Laws, D. R., and Rubin, H. B. (1969). Instructional control of an autonomic response.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2: 93–99.
- Malcolm, P. B., Davidson, P. R., and Marshall, W. L. (1985). Control of penile tumescence: The effects of arousal level and stimulus content.Behav. Res. Ther. 23: 273–280.
- Mavissakalian, M., Blanchard, E. B., Abel, G. G., and Barlow, D. H. (1975). Responses to complex erotic stimuli in homosexual and heterosexual males.Br. J. Psychiat. 126: 252–257.
- McAnulty, R. D., and Adams, H. E. (1990). Patterns of sexual arousal of accused child molesters involved in custody disputes.Arch. Sex. Behav. 19: 541–556.
- McConaghy, N. (1967). Penile volume changes to moving pictures of male and female nudes in heterosexual and homosexual males.Behav. Res. Ther 5: 43–48.
- Murphy, W. D., Krisak, J., Stalgaitis, S., and Anderson, K. (1984). The use of penile tumescence measures with incarcerated rapists: Further validity issues.Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 545–554.
- Quinsey, V. L., and Bergersen, S. G. (1976). Instructional control of penile circumference in assessments of sexual preference.Behav. Ther. 489–493.
- Quinsey, V. L., and Carrigan, W. F. (1978). Penile responses to visual stimuli.Crim. Justice Behav. 5: 333–342.
- Quinsey, V. L., and Chaplin, T. C. (1987). Preventing faking in phallometric assessments of sexual preference.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 528: 49–58.
- Rosen, R. C., Shapiro, D., and Schwartz, G. E. (1975). Voluntary control of penile tumescence.Psychosom. Med. 37: 479–483.
- Sakheim, D. K., Barlow, D. H., Beck, J. G., and Abrahamson, D. J. (1985). A comparison of male heterosexual and male homosexual patterns of sexual arousal.J. Sex Res. 21: 183–198.
- Tollison, C. D., Adams, H. E., and Tollison, J. W. (1979). Cognitive and physiological indices of sexual arousal in homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual males.J. Behav. Assess. 1: 305–314.
- Voluntary control of penile tumescence among homosexual and heterosexual subjects
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Volume 21, Issue 1 , pp 17-31
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- penile plethysmography
- voluntary control
- sexual arousal
- penile erection
- Industry Sectors