Models of female orgasm
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Self-report instruments concerning personality and subjective responses to sexual orgasm were filled out by 281 female university undergraduates. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to evaluate the dimensionality of women's subjective responsiveness to orgasm. The results did not support the concept of a unidimensional orgasm process; separate coital and masturbatory factors of orgasmic experience were obtained. Highly internally consistent scales were developed to assess the two factors, and both scales were found to be significantly correlated with indices of extraversion, attitudes toward masturbation, and sexual experience. A path-analytic model was developed which is consistent with the hypothesis that heterosexual and monosexual behaviors act as mediators between extraversion, neuroticism, and attitudes toward masturbation, on the one hand, and subjective coital or masturbatory orgasmic responsiveness, on the other. It appears that attitudes toward masturbation may also have a direct influence on masturbatory responsiveness. Various therapeutic implications of the path model are described. Replications and extensions of the study with older, more experienced populations are necessary.
- Abramson, P. R. (1977). Ethical requirements for research on human sexual behavior: From the perspective of participating subjects.J. Soc. Iss. 33: 184–192.
- Abramson, P. R., and Mosher, D. L. (1975). Development of a measure of negative attitudes toward masturbation.J. Consult. Psychol. 40: 485–490.
- Bentler, P. M. (1967). A scale for monosexual behavior. Mimeograph.
- Bentler, P. M. (1968). Heterosexual behavior assessment. II. Females.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 27–30.
- Bentler, P. M. (1976). Multistructure statistical model applied to factor analysis.Mult. Behav. Res. 11: 3–25.
- Bentler, P. M. (1978). The interdependence of theory, methodology, and empirical data: Causal modeling as an approach to construct validation. In Kandel, D. B. (ed.),Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues Wiley, New York.
- Bentler, P. M., and Huba, G. J. (1979). Simple minitheories of love.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37: 124–130.
- Bunzl, M., and Mullen, S. (1974). A self report investigation of two types of myotonic response during sexual orgasm.J. Sex Res. 10: 10–20.
- Butler, C. A. (1976). New data about female sexual response.J. Sex. Mar. Ther. 2: 40–46.
- Eysenck, H. J. (1976).Sex and Personality University of Texas Press, Austin.
- Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964).The Eysenck Personality Inventory University of London Press, London.
- Fisher, S. (1973).The Female Orgasm Basic Books, New York.
- Freud, S. (1938). Three contributions to the theory of sex. In Brill, A. A. (ed.),The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud Modern Library, New York, pp. 553–629.
- Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. (1976).LISREL III: Users Guide National Educational Resources, Chicago.
- Kaplan, H. S. (1974).The New Sex Therapy Brunner/Mazel, New York.
- Masters, W. H., and Johnson, V. E. (1966).Human Sexual Response Little, Brown, Boston.
- Mischel, W. (1968).Personality and Assessment Wiley, New York.
- Moore, B. (1961). Frigidity in women — Panel report.J. Am. Psychoan. Assoc. 9: 571–584.
- Robertiello, R. C. (1970). The “clitoral vs. vaginal orgasm” controversy and some of its ramifications.J. Sex Res. 6: 307–311.
- Ross, N. (1970). The primacy of genitality in the light of Dego psychology.J. Am. Psychoan. Assoc. 18: 267–284.
- Singer, J., and Singer, I. (1972). Types of female orgasm.J. Sex Res. 8: 255–267.
- Woodward, J. A., and Bentler, P. M. (1978). A statistical lower bound to population reliability.Psychol. Bull. 85: 1323–1326.
- Models of female orgasm
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Volume 8, Issue 5 , pp 405-423
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors