Prognosis in autism: A follow-up study

  • Marian K. DeMyer
  • Sandra Barton
  • William E. DeMyer
  • James A. Norton
  • John Allen
  • Robert Steele
Article

DOI: 10.1007/BF01538281

Cite this article as:
DeMyer, M.K., Barton, S., DeMyer, W.E. et al. J Autism Dev Disord (1973) 3: 199. doi:10.1007/BF01538281

Abstract

A follow-up study involving 85 autistic boys and 35 girls, c. 5 1/2 years of age at initial evaluation and 12 years at follow-up, is presented and discussed in considerable detail. Measures, also applied to 26 non-psychotic subnormal controls, included speech, social, educational, and family adequacy ratings, IQ's, and neurological data. Most autistic children remained educationally retarded and 42% were institutionalized. Good agreement with 2 studies by other authors indicated the following prognosis in autism: 1–2% recovery to normal, 5–15% borderline, 16–25% fair, and 60–75% poor. The best predictor of functional capacity in a work/school setting was the child's rating at intake. Performance IQ and severity of illness were next to best predictors. Case histories of 20 children with the best outcome, including 2 functioning normally, are compared and analyzed. Also, etiological implications of results are outlined in support of theories linking the cause of autism to biological factors.

Copyright information

© V. H. Winston & Sons, Inc. 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marian K. DeMyer
    • 1
  • Sandra Barton
    • 1
  • William E. DeMyer
    • 1
  • James A. Norton
    • 1
  • John Allen
    • 1
  • Robert Steele
    • 1
  1. 1.Indiana University School of MedicineUSA
  2. 2.Clinical Research Center for Early Childhood SchizophreniaLaRue D. Carter Memorial HospitalIndianapolis