Agricultural research and farm structural change: Bovine growth hormone and beyond
- Frederick H. Buttel
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Emerging bovine somatotropin (or “bovine growth hormone” [bGH]) technology has become highly controversial even though the technology is one to two years from commercial introduction. The bGH controversy is discussed and placed in the context of the evolution of the American public agricultural research system and farm structural change over the past 15 years. It is argued that while many observers tend to overestimate the degree to which bGH will be representative of other biotechnologies applied to agriculture, the bGH case may well reflect a more general pattern of the changing clientele relations of the land-grant system and of the changing character of technology developed within the public agricultural research system. In particular, these new clientele and technical relations may portend a new era in which farmers begin to scrutinize the land-grant research portfolio, which might in turn lead to diminished political support by state-level farmers' groups for agricultural research appropriations.
- Buttel, F. H. 1983 “Beyond the family farm.” In G. F. Summers (ed.),Technology and Social Change in Rural Areas. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Buttel, F. H. 1986a “Biotechnology and agricultural research policy: emergent issues.” In K. A. Dahlberg (ed.),New Directions for Agriculture and Agricultural Research. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.
- Buttel, F. H. 1986b “Biotechnology and public agricultural research policy.” Pp. 123–156 in V. J. Rhodes (ed.),Agricultural Science Policy in Transition. Bethesda, MD: Agricultural Research Institute.
- Buttel, F. H., J. T. Cowan, M. Kenney, and J. Kloppenburg, Jr. 1984 “Biotechnology in agriculture: the political economy of agribusiness reorganization and industry-university relationships.”Research in Rural Sociology and Development 1:315–43.
- Cochrane, W. W. 1979The Development of American Agriculture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Doyle, J. 1985Altered Harvest. New York: Viking.
- Hansen, M., L. Busch, J. Burkhardt, W. B. Lacy, and L. R. Lacy 1986 “Plant breeding and biotechnology.”BioScience 36 (January):29–39.
- Kalter, R. J. 1985 “The new biotech agriculture: unforeseen economic consequences.”Issues in Science and Technology (Fall): 125–133.
- Kalter, R. J., et al. 1984 “Biotechnology and the dairy industry: production costs and commercial potential of the bovine growth hormone.” A. E. Research 84—22. Ithaca, NY: Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University.
- Kalter, R. J., et al. 1985 “Biotechnology and the dairy industry: production costs, commercial potential, and the economic impact of the bovine growth hormone.” A. E. Research 85—20. Ithaca, NY: Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University.
- Kenney, M., and J. Kloppenburg, Jr. 1983 “The American agricultural research system: an obsolete structure?”Agricultural Administration 14:1–10.
- Kloppenburg, J., Jr. 1984 “The social impacts of biogenetic technology in agriculture: past and future.” In G. M. Berardi and C. C. Geisler (eds.),The Social Consequences and Challenges of New Agricultural Technologies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- LeVeen, E. P. 1978 “The prospects for small-scale farming in an industrial society: a critical analysis ofSmall is Beautiful.” In R. C. Dorf and Y. L. Hunter (eds.),Appropriate Visions. San Francisco: Boyd and Fraser.
- Molnar, J. J., and H. Kinnucan 1985 “Biotechnology and the small farm: implications of an emerging trend.” In T. T. Williams (ed.),Strategy for the Survival of Small Farmers. Tuskegee Institute, AL: Human Resources Development Center, Tuskegee Institute.
- Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) 1984Commercial Biotechnology. Washington, DC: OTA
- Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) 1986Technology, Public Policy, and the Changing Structure of American Agriculture. Washington, DC: OTA.
- Ruttan, V. W. 1982Agricultural Research Policy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Tweeten, L. 1983 “Economic instability in agriculture: the contributions of prices, government programs, and exports.”American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (December):922–931.
- Agricultural research and farm structural change: Bovine growth hormone and beyond
Agriculture and Human Values
Volume 3, Issue 4 , pp 88-98
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors