Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 4–25

Participatory research and the race to save the planet: Questions, critique, and lessons from the field

Authors

  • Dianne E. Rocheleau
Article

DOI: 10.1007/BF01530443

Cite this article as:
Rocheleau, D.E. Agric Hum Values (1994) 11: 4. doi:10.1007/BF01530443

Abstract

Participation has been widely touted as “the answer” to a number of problems facing sustainable development programs. It is not enough, however, to involve rural people as workers and informants in research and planning endeavors defined by outsiders. A truly collaborative approach will depend upon our ability to broaden our definitions of research and participation, to accommodate a wide spectrum of land users and local knowledge, and to expand our repertoire of research methods. This paper presents a critique of facile approaches to participation, outlines a more inclusive framework for who participates on what terms, and reviews a variety of methods that address the complex realities of rural livelihoods and landscapes. The final section of the paper suggests a multi-institutional model that combines the complementary strengths of several types of organizations in participatory field research and planning.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994