Skip to main content
Log in

Huffman algebras for independent random variables

  • Published:
Discrete Event Dynamic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a rearrangement inequality by Hardy, Littlewood, and Polya, we define two-operator algebras for independent random variables. These algebras are called Huffman algebras since the Huffman algorithm on these algebras produces an optimal binary tree that minimizes the weighted lengths of leaves. Many examples of such algebras are given. For the case with random weights of the leaves, we prove the optimality of the tree constructed by the power-of-2 rule, i.e., the Huffman algorithm assuming identical weights, when the weights of the leaves are independent and identically distributed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow, R.E., and Proschan, F. 1988.Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing Probability Models. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., and Solomon, H. 1973. Optimal issuing policies under stochastic field lives.J. Appl. Probab. 10, pp. 761–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L.L. 1966. Definition of entropy by means of a coding problem.Z. Wahrsch. verw. Gebiete 6, pp. 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.S. 1992. A new ordering for stochastic majorization: theory and applications.Adv. Appl. Probab. 24, pp. 604–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.S. and Thomas, J.A. 1992. Huffman algebras for independent random variables.IBM RC 17524.

  • Chang, C.S., and Yao, D.D. 1993. Rearrangement, majorization and stochastic scheduling.Math. Oper. Res., 18, pp. 659–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassey, C.R., and Karp, R.M. 1976. On the optimality of Huffman trees.SIAM J. Appl. math. 31, pp. 368–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golumbic, M.C. 1976. Combinatorial merging.IEEE Trans. Comput. C-25, pp. 1164–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J.E., and Polya, G. 1952.Inequalities. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, T.C., Kleitman, D. and Tamaki, J.K. 1979. Binary trees optimum under various criteria.SIAM J. Appl. Math. 37, pp. 246–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, T.C., and Tucker, A.C. 1971. Optimal computer search trees and variable length alphabetic codes.SIAM J. Appl. Math. 21, pp. 514–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, D.A. 1952. A method for the construction of minimum redundancy codes.Proc. IRE 40, 1098–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humblet, P.A. 1981. Generalization of Huffman coding to minimize the probability of buffer overflow.IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-27, pp. 230–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, F.K. 1979. Generalized Huffman trees.SIAM J. Appl. Math. 37, pp. 124–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itai, A. 1976. Optimal algebraic trees.SIAM J. Comput. 5, pp. 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilson, J., and Sumita, U. 1982. Uniform stochastic ordering and related inequalities.The Can. J. Statist. 10, pp. 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, D.E. 1982. Huffman's algorithm via algebra.J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 32, pp. 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A.W., and Olkin, I. 1979.Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D.S. 1979. Combinatorial merging and Huffman's algorithm.IEEE Trans. Comput. TC-28, pp. 365–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D.S. 1980. Conditions for optimality of the Huffman algorithm.SIAM J. Comput. 9, pp. 470–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renyi, A. 1961. On measuresof entropy and information.Proc. Fourth Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Probability I, pp. 547–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.M. 1983.Stochastic Processes. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanthikumar, J.G., and Yao, D.D. 1991. Bivariate characterization of some stochastic order relations.Adv. Appl. Probab. 23, pp. 642–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyan, D. 1983.Comparison Methods for Queues and Other Stochastic Models. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R.R., Varaiya, P., and Walrand, J. 1986. Scheduling jobs with stochastically ordered processing times on parallel machines to minimize expected flowtime.J. Appl. Probabl. 23, pp. 841–847.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, CS., Thomas, J.A. Huffman algebras for independent random variables. Discrete Event Dyn Syst 4, 23–40 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01516009

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01516009

Key Words

Navigation