Positive effects of cognitive conflict and employee voice
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Conflict is usually viewed as undesirable and negative. Recent empirical work, however, has documented several positive outcomes from conflict. Benefits range from better problem solving and understanding to higher employee efforts. Since allowing employees voice in organizations raises cognitive conflict levels, one expects attendant benefits. However, conflict also leads to bad feelings and threatens those with a stake in the status quo. Thus, programmed conflict is needed. Two examples include a Devil's Advocate Decision Program and the use of outside auditors. These processes are intended to require conflict in organizational decisions.
- Bourgeois, L. J. (1985). Strategic goals, environmental uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments.Academy of Management Journal, 28, 548–573.
- Cosier, R. A. (1978). The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on predictions accuracy.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 295–306.
- Cosier, R., & Rose, G. (1977). Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, 378–391.
- Cosier, R., & Schwenk, C. (1990). Agreement and thinking alike: Ingredients for poor decisions.Academy of Management Executive, 4, 69–74.
- Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory.Academy of Management Journal, 31, 737–770.
- Gorden, W. (1988). Range of employee voice.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1, 283–299.
- Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Paulus, P. B. (ed.),Basic Group Processes, 235–256.New York:Springer-Verlag.
- Janis, I. (1972).Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
- Ruble, T., & Cosier, R. (1983). Conflict processes. In Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. (eds.),Organizational Behavior. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
- Schwenk, C., & Cosier, R. (1980). Effects of the expert, devil's advocate, and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performance.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 409–424.
- Tjosvold, D. (1985). Implications of controversy research for management.Journal of Management, 11, 21–37.
- Tjosvold, D. (1982). Effects of approach to controversy on superiors' incorporation of subordinates' information in decision making.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 189–193.
- Tjosvold, D., & Deemer, D. K. (1980). Effects of controversy within a cooperative or competitive context on organizational decision making.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 590–595.
- Tjosvold, D., & Johnson, D. (1977). The effects of controversy on cognitive perspective taking.Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 679–685.
- Tjosvold, D., & Johnson, D. (1978). Controversy within a cooperative or competitive context and cognitive perspective taking.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 376–386.
- Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D., & Fabrey, J. (1980). Effects of controversy and defensiveness on cognitive perspective taking.Psychological Reports, 47, 1043–1050.
- Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D., & Lerner, J. (1981). The effects of affirmation and acceptance on incorporation of an opposing opinion in problem solving.Journal of Social Psychology, 114, 103–110.
- Positive effects of cognitive conflict and employee voice
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Volume 4, Issue 1 , pp 7-11
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- problem solving
- Industry Sectors