Skip to main content
Log in

Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reviews research on gender and learning styles of students, 18 and older, conducted after 1980. Curry's onion model (1983) is used to classify definitions of learning styles and to reconstruct the theoretical frameworks used. The extent to which learning style is considered stable or variable in different learning contexts determines its position in the model. Most studies used theoretical frameworks that belonged in the middle or outer layers of the model. This location indicates the strong influence of learning context on women's and men's learning styles. While there were differences between learning styles, research designs rarely included learning contexts.

In addition to the narrative review, we performed a quantitative meta-analysis on two instruments (Kolb's Learning Style Inventory and Entwistle's Approaches to Studying Inventory) to determine the direction and magnitude of gender differences in various samples. A search for these two instruments resulted in 26 studies for which the necessary statistics were available. On Kolb's instrument, the results showed that men were more likely than women to prefer the abstract conceptualisation mode of learning. On Entwistle's ASI a difference was found on the affective components of approaches to studying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, S., Megarry, J., Nesbit, S., and Hoyle, E. (eds.) (1984).World Yearbook of Education: Women and Education. London: Kogan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Haïm, G., and Wilkes, J.M. (1989). ‘A cognitive interpretation of the marginality and under-representation of women in science’,Journal of Higher Education 6, 371–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter Magolda, M.B. (1987).Gender Differences in Cognitive Development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C. (ERIC No. ED 284 908).

  • Baxter Magolda, M.B. (1989). ‘Gender differences in cognitive development: An analysis of cognitive complexity and learning styles’,Journal of College Student Development 30(3), 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J.B. (1987).Student approaches to learning and studying. Research Monograph. Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd. (ERIC No. ED 308 201).

  • included in the meta-analysis. Bokoros, M.A., Goldstein, M.B., and Sweeney, M.M.et al. (1990).Common Cognitive Personality Factors in Non-clinical Measures. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA. (ERIC No. ED 328 819).

  • Burton, L. (ed.) (1990).Gender and mathematics. An International Perspective. Strand: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, B. (1984). ‘Sex differences in cognitive strategic preference among medical students’,Perceptual and Motor Skills 58(1), 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjea, R.G., and Paul, B. (1982). ‘Cognitive style, social environment, sex and recognition capacity’,Psycho-Lingua 12(1), 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, S.F., Brush, L., and Wilson, D.M. (eds.) (1985).Women and Mathematics: Balancing the Equation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Choi, J.M. (1989). ‘Learning styles of academic librarians’,College and Research Libraries 50(6), 691–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Clarke, R.M. (1986). ‘Students’ approaches to learning in an innovative medical school: a cross-sectional study’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 56, 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Revised Edition). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Coles, C.R. (1985). ‘Differences between conventional and problem-based curricula in their students’ approaches to studying’,Medical Education 19, 308–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Cordell, B.J. (1991). ‘A study of learning styles and computer-assisted instruction’,Computers and Education 16(2), 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Cornwell, J.M., Manfredo, P.A., and Dunlap, W.P. (1991). ‘Factor analysis of the 1985 revision of Kolb's Learning Style Inventory’,Educational and Psychological Measurement 51, 455–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, L. (1983).An Organization of Learning Styles Theory and Constructs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. (ERIC No. ED 235 185).

  • Dippelhofer-Stiem, B. (1989). ‘The development of research-oriented learning in five European countries’,European Journal of Psychology of Education 4, 489–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Dorsey, O.L., and Pierson, M.J. (1984). ‘A descriptive study of adult learning styles in a nontraditional education program’,Lifelong Learning, 8–11.

  • Dronkers, J. (1990).De Opbrengst van Schoolloopbaanonderzoek; een Terugblik op een Decennium en een Voorschouw op het Volgende, Working Papers 42. [The Results of Research on Schoolcareers, a Retrospectrive View on a Decade and a Prospective View on the Next]. Tilburg: Vakgroep Sociologie, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckwell, J.M., Arnold, L., and Hayes, J. (1990).Approaches to Learning by Undergraduate Students: A Longitudinal Study. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Louisville KY (ERIC No. ED 322 677).

  • Eccles, J., MacIver, D., and Lange, L. (1986).Classroom Practices and Motivation to Study Mathematics. San Francisco: Contribution to the AERA-Conference.

  • Entwistle, N.J. (1981).Styles of Learning and Teaching. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., and Leder, G. (eds.) (1990).Mathematics and Gender. New York and London: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Gledhill, R.F., and Van der Merwe, C.A. (1989). Gender as a factor in student learning: preliminary findings’,Medical Education 23, 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D.F. (1992).Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Hayden, R.R., and Brown, M.S. (1985). ‘Learning styles and correlates’,Psychological Reports 56, 243–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L.V., and Olkin, I. (1985).Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Hines, S.J., and Seidman, S.A. (1988).The Effects of Selected CAI Design Strategies on Achievement, and an Exploration of other Related Factors. Proceedings of selected research papers presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC No. ED 295 646).

  • included in the meta-analysis. Hudak, M.A., and Anderson, D.E. (1990). ‘Formal operations and learning style predict success in statistics and computer science courses’,Teaching of Psychology 17(4), 231–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Katz, N. (1988). ‘Individual learning style: Israeli norms and cross-cultural equivalence of Kolb's LSI’Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 19(3), 361–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.A. (1976).Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual. Boston: McBerand Company, revised 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.A. (1984).Experiential Learning, Experience as a Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotwick, G.H., Simon, A., Ward, L.O. (1981). ‘Field dependence/independence and its relation to sex of polytechnic students’,Perceptual and Motor Skills 53, 271–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, R.J., and Pillemer, D.B. (1984).Summing up; the Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Logan, E. (1990). ‘Cognitive styles and online behavior of novice searchers’,Information Processing and Management 26(4), 503–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., and Säljö, R. (1976a). ‘On qualitative differences in learning, 1-outcome and process’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., and Säljö, R. (1976b). ‘On qualitative differences in learning, 2-outcomes as a function of the learners conception of the task’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D.B. (1991). ‘The effects of learning style on grades of first year college students’,Research in Higher Education 32, 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Miller, C.D., Finley, J., and McKinley, D.L. (1990). ‘Learning approaches and motives: male and female differences and implications for learning assistance programs’,Journal of College Student Development 31(2), 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myer, K.A., and Higgins, H.J. (1984). ‘Cognitive style, gender and self-report of principle as predictors of adult performance on Piaget's Water Level Task’,Journal of Genetic Psychology 144(2), 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R.J.L. (1982). ‘Sex differences in objective test performance’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 52, 213–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Newland, J.R., and Woelfl, N.N. (1992). ‘Learning style and academic performance within a group of sophomore medical students’,Academic Medicine 67(5), 349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrakis, E. (1981). ‘Cognitive styles of physical education majors’,Perceptual and Motor Skills 53(2), 574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J.K., and Geiger, M.A. (1991). ‘Changes in learning-style preferences: a prefatory report of longitudinal findings’,Psychological Reports 68, 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser Gelwick, B. (1985). ‘Cognitive development of women’,Facilitating the Development of Women. New Directions for student services. No. 29. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, March 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L., Parker, L., Hildebrand, G. (eds.) (1991).Action for Equity: the Second Decade. Contributions to the Sixth International GASAT-Conference. Victoria: University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Rhodes, R.W. (1990). ‘Measurement of Navajo and Hopi brain dominance and learning styles’,Journal of American Indian Education 29(3), 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Richardson, J.T.E. (1990). ‘Reliability and replicability of the Approaches to Studying Questionnaire’,Studies in Higher Education 15(2), 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R.R. (1983). ‘Learning styles of college students’, in, Dillon, R., and Schmeck, R.R. (eds.),Individual Differences in Cognition (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press. pp. 233–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonberger, A.K. (1981).Gender Differences in Solving Mathematics Problems among Two-Year College Students in a Developmental Algebra Class and Related Factors. Paper presented at the Midyear Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Special Interest Group on Women in Education, Washington DC (ERIC No. ED 214 602).

  • Schwarzer, R. (1989).Manual for Meta-Analysis. Berlin: Institut für Psychologie (WE 7), Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speth, C., and Brown, R. (1990). ‘Effects of college students' learning styles and gender on their test preparation strategies’,Applied Cognitive Psychology 4(3), 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M.J., and O'Brien, T.P. (1991).Learning Styles and Achievement in Postsecondary Classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago IL (ERIC No. ED 331 554).

  • Van Rossum, E.J., and Schenk, S.M. (1984). ‘The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 54(1), 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veres, J.G., Sims, R.R., and Locklear, T.S. (1991). ‘Improving the reliability of Kolb's revised Learning Style Inventory’,Educational and Psychological Measurement 51, 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Vernon-Gerstenfeld, S. (1989). ‘Serendipity? Are there gender differences in the adoption of computers. A case study’,Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 21(3–4), 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volman, M., ten Dam, G., and van Eck, E. (1993). ‘Girls in the educational research discourse’,Comenius 13(2) 198–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • included in the meta-analysis. Watkins, D., and Hattie, J. (1981). ‘The learning processes of Australian university students: Investigations of contextual and personological factors’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 51(3), 384–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (1991). (ed.).Girls and Young Women in Education. A European Perspective. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H.A. (1979). ‘Socialization, culture and ecology in the development of group and sex differences in cognitive style’,Human Development 22, 358–372.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Severiens, S.E., Ten Dam, G.T.M. Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis. High Educ 27, 487–501 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384906

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384906

Keywords

Navigation