Developmental differences between distributed and face-to-face groups in electronically supported meeting environments: An exploratory investigation
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This longitudinal pilot study compared the developmental patterns of groups in three types of electronically supported meeting modes: face-to-face, dispersed-synchronous, and dispersed-asynchronous. The modes differed primarily in interactivity, channel capacity, and synchronicity. Comparisons were made along several behavioral and socio-technical dimensions which influence the group development process. Face-to-face groups tended to exhibit more effective leadership and coordination competence over time as compared to the distributed groups. However, along several other group process dimensions such as cohesiveness and equality of participation, dispersed groups did not differ from their face-to-face counterparts. Moreover, groups in all three modes performed equally well in terms of the quality of outputs. These results suggest that electronically distributed work groups—with adequate time and training—can become cohesive and perform effectively in the long run.
- Beauclair, R.A. (1987). “An Experimental Study of the Effects of Group Decision Support System Process Support Applications on Small Group Decision Making.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
- Chidambaram, L., and R.P. Bostrom. (1993). “Evolution of Group Performance over Time: A Repeated Measures Study of GSS Effects,”The Journal of Organizational Computing.
- Chidambaram, L., R.P. Bostrom, and B.E. Wynne. (1990–1991). “A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Grou Decision Support, Systems on Group Development,”Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (Winter), 7–25.
- Connolly, T., L. Jessup, and J.S. Valacich. (1990). “Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer Mediated Workgroups,”Management Science 39(6), 689–703.
- Daft, R.L., and R.H. Lengel. (1986). “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness, and Structural Design,”Management Science 32(5), 554–571.
- DeSanctis, G., and R.B. Gallupe. (1987). “A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems,”Management Science 33(5), 589–609.
- Fisher, B.A., and D.G. Ellis. (1990).Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Publishing Company.
- Galegher, J., and R.E. Kraut. (1990). “Computer Mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: A Field Experiment in Group Writing,”Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 65–78.
- Gallupe, R.B. (1985).The Impact of Task Difficulty on the Use of a Group Decision Support System. Unpublished doctoral dissetation, University of Minnesota.
- Giddens, A. (1977).Studies in Social and Political Theory. New York: Basic Books.
- Hiemstra, G. (1982). “Teleconferencing, Concern for Face, and Organizational Culture.” In M. Burgoon (ed.),Communication Yearbook, Vol. 6. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 874–904.
- Hiltz, S.R., and Johnson, K. (1990). “User Satisfaction With Computer Mediated Communication Systems,”Management Science 36(5), 739–764.
- Hiltz, S.R., K. Johnson, and M. Turoff. (1986). “Experiments in Group Decision Making: Communication Process and Outcome in Face-to-Face Versus Computerized Conferences,”Human Communication Research 13,(2), 225–252.
- Jarvenpaa, S.L., V.S. Rao, and G.p. Huber. (1988). “Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment,”MIS Quarterly (December), 645–665.
- Jessup, L.M., T. Connolly and J. Galegher. (1990). “The Effects of Anonymity on GSS Group Process With an Idea Generating Task,”MIS Quarterly (September).
- Johansen, R. (1991). “Teams for Tomorrow.”Proceedings, of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 521–534.
- Kiesler, S., J. Siegel, and T.W. McGuire. (1984). “Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication.”American Psychologist 39(10), 1123–1134.
- Kraut, R.E., J. Galegher, and C. Egido. (1987–1988). “Relationships and Tasks in Scientific Research Collaboration”Human Computer Interaction, 3, 31–58.
- Kutsko, J., and J.Y. Smith. (1991). “Effectiveness Measures for Distributed Teams Using Electronic Meeting Technology: The Larson/Lafasto Instrument.” InProceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 3. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 458–470.
- Latané, B. (1981). “Psychology of Social Impact,”American Psychologist 36, 343–356.
- Lewis, L.F. (1987). “A Decision Support System for Face-to-Face Groups,”Journal of Information Science 13, 211–219.
- Lim, F.J., and I. Benbasat. 91991). “A Communication Based Framework for Group Interfaces in Computer Supported Collaboration.” InProceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 3. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 610–620.
- Losada, M., P. Sanchez, and E. Noble. (1990). “Collaborative Technology and Group Process Feedback: Their Impact on Interactive Sequences in Meetings.” InProceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 53–64.
- McGrath, J.E. (1991). “Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups.”Small Group Research 22(2), 147–174.
- McGrath, J.E. (1984).Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice. Hall.
- Orlikowski, W.J. (1991). “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations.” Center for Information Systems Research Working Paper No. 219.
- Poole, M.S., and G. DeSanctis (1989). “Understanding the Use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration.” In J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (eds.),Organizations and Communication Technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 173–193.
- Poole, M.S., and R.Lind. (1991). “The Process of Using Group Decision Support Systems as a Key Influence on Communication Processes and Outcomes.” Paper submitted to the Human Technology Interest Group for presentation at the International Communication Association conference.
- Rice, R.E., and G. Love (1987). “Electronic Emotion: Socio-Emotional Content in a Computer-Mediated Communication Network,”Communication Research 14(1), 85–108.
- Seashore, S.E. (1954).Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Siegel, J., V. Dubrovsky, S. Kiesler, and T.W. McGuire. (1986). “Group Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, 157–187.
- Short, J., E. Williams, and B. Christie. (1976).The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
- Smith, J., and M.T. Vanecek. (1989). “A Nonsimultaneous Computer Conference as a Component of Group Decision Support Systems.” InProceedings of the Twenty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 3. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 370–377.
- Trevino, L.K., R.L. Daft, and R.H. Lengel. (1990). “Understanding Managers' Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective.” In J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (eds.),Organizations and Communication. Technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 173–193.
- Walther, J.B. (1992a). “A Longitudinal Experiment on Relational Tone in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Interacton.” InProceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 4. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 220–231.
- Walther, J.B. (1992b). “Interpersonal Effects in, Computer-Mediated Interaction.: A Relational Perspective,”Communication Research 19(1), 52–90.
- Walther, J.B., and J.K. Burgoon. (1992). “Relational. Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction,”Human Communication Research 19(1), 50–88.
- Watson, R.T., G. DeSanctis, and M.S. Poole. (1988). “Using a GSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences.”MIS Quarterly 12(3), 463–478.
- Zigurs, I., M.S. Poole, and G.L. DeSanctis. (1988). “A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making,”MIS Quarterly (December), 625–644.
- Developmental differences between distributed and face-to-face groups in electronically supported meeting environments: An exploratory investigation
Group Decision and Negotiation
Volume 4, Issue 3 , pp 213-233
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links