Skip to main content
Log in

Why pollution standards are preferred by industries: pragmatism and rent-seeking behaviour

  • Papers
  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regulatory instruments in environmental policy have strongraison d'etre. They still dominate the instruments selected by policy makers. Even with the growing interest in the use of economic instruments, in theory, empirical studies and policy, industries tend to prefer command-and-control as a practical instrument in pollution control. Polluters often assume they have more influence on regulation than on setting effluent charge levels. The industry can be better off under the regulatory standard than an imposed effluent charge when the total cost of abatement to the industry is considered. The higher costs to the industry make effluent charges less attractive. In practice, generally a ‘mixed’ environmental policy is used in which regulations dominate. This choice has been based on effectiveness, economic efficiency and political acceptability. By simulating the abatement cost function, it was found that marketable permits offer an attractive system of pollution control when the scope of variation in abatement levels is evident. Unfortunately, at higher levels of abatement, the benefits of this system are small and insufficient to justify any regulatory reform. Thus, with a pragmatic approach coupled with a rent-seeking behaviour of the polluters, a shift to the use of economic instruments is neither likely nor desirable even when administrative and transactions costs are not considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Department of Environment, Malaysia (1991)Environmental Quality Report.

  • Hahn, R.W. (1989) Economic prescription for environmental problems: how the patient followed the doctor's orders.Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(2), 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalid, A.R. (1993) The economics of pollution control: does Malaysia need regulatory reform? In:Contributions to training in environmental economics in the Asia-Pacific region. Nettlap publication No. 6, (November), United Nations Environment Programme, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific: pp. 135–72.

  • Khalid A.R. (1994a) Tradeable discharge permits: a cost-effective instrument in pollution control.Malaysian Journal of Agricultural Economics 11, 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalid A.R. (1994b) The standard-cum-charge approach in environmental policy: the malaysian experience. In: D. O'Connor (ed),Applying economic instruments to environmental policies in OECD and dynamic non-member economics. pp. 59–82, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, A. and Singam, G. (1977) Pollution control in the palm oil industry — promulgations of regulations.Planter 53, 470–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, A. (1984) Legislative measures in the control of palm oil mill effluent discharge. In:Proceedings of the workshop on review of palm oil mill effluent technology vis-a-vis Department of Environment standard (PORIM WORKSHOP Proceedings, No. 9), Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia.

  • Montgomery, D.W. (1972) Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs.Journal of Economic Theory 5, 395–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A.S.H., Maheswaran, A. and Ma Ah Ngan (1987) Malaysia: In Chia Lin Sien (ed)Environmental management in Southeast Asia, Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T.H. (1980) Transferable discharge permits and the control of stationary source air pollution: a survey and synthesis.Land Economics 56, 391–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M.L. (1974) Prices vs quantities.Review of Economic Studies 41(4), 477–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr Khalid Abdul Rahim is currently a lecturer in the Faculty of Economics and Management at the Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. He is also a visiting Fellow at the Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia, in Kuala Lumpur, and the Thematic Network Coordinator in the UNEP Network for Environmental Training at tertiary Level in Asia and the Pacific (NET-TLAP).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rahim, K.A. Why pollution standards are preferred by industries: pragmatism and rent-seeking behaviour. Environmentalist 16, 49–53 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325614

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325614

Keywords

Navigation