Skip to main content
Log in

Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is considerable evidence, gathered in a variety of settings and across many different types of materials and procedures, that spaced repetitions—regardless of whether they are in the form of additional study opportunities or successful tests—are a highly effective means of promoting learning. Research on spacing effects is reviewed and its theoretical and educational implications are examined. It is concluded that spacing effects can best be understood in terms of the “accessibility” hypothesis, and that spaced repetitions have considerable potential for improving classroom learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., and Estes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 8: 463–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., and Biddle, W. B. (1975). On asking people questions about what they are reading. In Bower, G. H. (ed.),The Psychology of Language and Motivation (Vol. 9), New York, Academic Press, pp. 90–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster, B. B., and Anderson, T. H. (1984). Structures of explanation in history textbooks or so what if Governor Stanford missed the spike and hit the rail?J. Curric. Studies 16: 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, S. D. M. (1921). A study in logical memory.Am. J. Psychol. 32: 370–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1966). Early versus delayed review in meaningful learning.Psychol. Schools 3: 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1976).The Psychology of Memory. New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, H. P., and Phelps, E. (1987). Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years.J. Exper. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 13: 344–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A. (1979). Information-processing analysis of college teaching.Educat. Psychol. 14: 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A., and Allen, T. W. (1970). The spacing effect: Consolidation or differential encoding?J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 9: 567–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1972). Stimulus-sampling theory of encoding variability. In Melton, A. W., and Martin, E. (Eds.),Coding in Human Memory New York, Winston & Sons, pp. 85–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainerd, C. J., Kingma, J., and Howe, M. L. (1985). On the development of forgetting.Child Devel. 56: 1103–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, R. H. (1968). Effects of review and testlike events within the learning of prose material.J. Educat. Psychol. 59: 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, P. C. (1970). Intensive review as a procedure in teaching arithmetic.Elem. School J. 60: 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burry, J., Catteral, J., Choppin, B., and Dorr-Bremme, D. (1982). Testing in the nation's schools and districts: How much? What kinds? To what ends? At what costs? (CSE report no. 194). Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, E. H. (1980). Distributed study facilitates infants' delayed recognition memory.Mem. Cognit. 8: 539–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn, W. F. (1910). Experiments in learning.J. Educat. Psychol. 1: 373–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellarosa, D., and Bourne, L. E. (1985). Surface form and the spacing effect.Mem. Cognit. 13: 529–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, F. N. (1986). Spacing effects in text recall: An extrapolation from the laboratory to the classroom (submitted for publication).

  • Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning.J. Educat. Psychol. 79: 162–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research.Am. Psychol. 43: 627–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, F. N. (1989). Do sentence contexts facilitate vocabulary learning? Additional comparisons (submitted for publication).

  • Donaldson, W. (1970). Output effects in multitrial free recall.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 10: 577–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1885).Memory (translated by H. A. Ruger and C. E. Bussenius). New York, Teachers College, 1913. Paperback ed., New York, Dover, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmes, D. G., Dye, C. J., and Herdelin, N. J. (1983). What is the role of affect in the spacing effect?Mem. Cognit. 11: 144–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmes, D. G., Greener, W. I., and Wilkinson, W. C. (1972). Free recall of items presented after massed- and distributed-practice items.Am. J. Psychol. 85: 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, H. B., Wellborn, E. L., and Killian, C. D. (1934). Studies in substance memorization.J. Gen. Psychol. 11: 233–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in memorizing.Arch. Psychol. 6: 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, L. R. (1973). Temporal position of reviews and its effect on the retention of mathematical rules.J. Educat. Psychol. 64: 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, M., and Duarte, A. (1971). Repetition between and within languages in free recall.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 10: 625–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.Mem. Cognit. 7: 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., and Lehmann, T. S. (1980). Spacing repetitions over 1 week.Mem. Cognit. 8: 528–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., and Smith, S. M. (1981). Spacing repetitions and solving problems are not the same.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 20: 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A., and Corkill, A. J. (1987). Influence of paraphrased repetitions on the spacing effect.J. Educat. Psychol. 79: 198–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. G., Chance, J. E., and Otto, J. (1987). Enhanced face recognition memory after distributed viewing. Presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle, Washington.

  • Good, T. L., and Brophy, J. E. (1986).Educational Psychology (3rd ed.). New York, Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L., and Grouws, D. A. (1979). The Missouri mathematics effectiveness project.J. Educat. Psychol. 71: 355–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, K. (1925). Class results with spaced and unspaced memorizing.J. Exper. Psychol. 8: 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1970). Conservation of information-processing capacity in paired-associate memorizing.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 9: 581–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halff, H. M. (1977). The role of opportunities for recall in learning to retrieve.Am. J. Psychol. 90: 383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E. R., and Bower, G. H. (1975).Theories of Learning (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman, D. L. (1974). Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. In Solso, R. L. (ed.).Theories in Cognitive Psychology: The Loyola Symposium Potomac, Maryland, Erlbaum, pp. 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. In Bower, G. H. (ed.),The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 10), New York, Academic Press, pp. 47–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman, D. L., and Rogers, M. K. (1973). Spacing effects in picture memory.Mem. Cognit. 1: 430–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman, D. L., Summers, J. J., and Block, R. A. (1975). What causes the spacing effect? Some effects of repetition, duration, and spacing on memory for pictures.Mem. Cognit. xx: 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. M., and Kintsch, W. (1971). Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 10: 562–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izawa, C. (1971). The test trial potentiating model.J. Math. Psychol. 8: 200–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 17: 649–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. E. (1923–1924). The effects of examination on permanence of learning.Arch. Psychol. 10: 21–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. C., and Kellough, R. D. (1987).A Resource Guide for Secondary School Teaching (4th ed.). New York, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, R. M., and Jenkins, J. J. (1981). The lag effect with aurally presented passages.Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 17: 132–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhs, T., Porter, A., Floden, R., Freeman, D., Schmidt, W., and Schwille, J. (1985). Differences among teachers in their use of curriculum-embedded tests.Elem. School J. 86: 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, R., and Laughery, K. L. (1968). Is a test trial a training trial in free recall learning?J. Exper. Psychol. 76: 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K. (1969). Reinforcement as consolidation.Psychol. Rev. 76: 82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K., and Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., and Sykes, R. N. (eds.),Practical Aspects of Memory New York, Academic Press, pp. 625–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. O. (1914). The relation of length of material to time taken for learning and the optimum distribution of time.J. Educat. Psychol. 5: 85–91, 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magliero, A. (1983). Pupil dilations following pairs of identical words and related to-be-remembered words.Mem. Cognit. 11: 609–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (1972). Stimulus encoding in learning and transfer. In Meltin, A. W., and Martin, E. (eds.),Coding Processes in Human Memory Washington, D.C., Winston, pp. 59–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • MasKarinec, A. S., and Thompson, C. P. (1976). The within list distributed practice effect: Tests of the varied context and varied encoding hypotheses.Mem. Cognit. 4: 741–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1987).Educational Psychology: A Cognitive Approach. Boston, Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., and Masson, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representation through retrieval.J. Exper. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 11: 371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, P. A., and Watkins, M. W. (1983). Computerized vs. conventional remedial instruction for learning disabled pupils.J. Special Ed. 17: 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, B., and Grotelueschen, A. (1972). Direction of the effect of questions in prose material.J. Educat. Psychol. 63: 586–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch, J. A. (1943).The Psychology of Human Learning. New York, Longmans Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, A. W. (1970). The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 9: 596–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, V. (1976). Effects on a later recall by delaying initial recall.J. Exper. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 2: 609–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch, M. (1984).Infant Memory. New York, Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B., Jr., and Babick, A. J. (1961). The effect of repetition on the retention of individual words.J. Psychol. 74: 596–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nungester, R. J., and Duchastel, P. C. (1982). Testing versus review: Effects on retention.J. Educat. Psychol. 74: 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, P. A., and Naus, M. J. (1978). Rehearsal processes in children's memory. In Ornstein, P. A. (ed.),Memory Development in Children Hillsdale, New Jersey, Erlbaum, pp. 69–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, N. L. (1914). The value of distributed repetitions in rote learning.Brit. J. Psychol. 1: 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, H. A., Ellis, M., Toohill, N., and Kloess, P. (1935). Some measurements of the effects of reviews.J. Educat. Psychol. 26: 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petros, T., and Hoving, K. (1980). The effects of review on young children's memory for prose.J. Exper. Child Psychol. 30: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L., and Knecht, K. (1983). Encoding variability and retention.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 22: 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, W. H. (1913). Economical learning.J. Educat. Psychol. 3: 148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea, C. P., and Modigliani, V. (1985). The effect of expanded versus massed practice on the retention of multiplication facts and spelling lists.Hum. Learn. 4: 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea, C. P., and Modigliani, V. (1987). The spacing effect in 4- to 9-year-old children.Mem. Cognit. 15: 436–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R. A., and Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Black, A. H., and Prokasy, W. F. (eds.),Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 64–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. H., and Glaser, R. (1964). Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task.J. Educat. Psychol. 55: 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J. (1980). Encoding variability, levels of processing, and the effects of spacing of repetitions upon judgments of frequency.Mem. Cognit. 8: 84–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J. (1984). Processing time for repetitions and the spacing effect.Canad. J. Psychol. 38: 537–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., and Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In Wittrock, M. C. (ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd. ed.), New York, Macmillan, pp. 376–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, E. Z. (1963). Some observations on predicting instructional effectiveness by simple inspection.J. Prog. Instruct. 3: 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, E. Z. (1966). Learning from written instructive materials: An exploration of the control of inspection behavior by test-like events.Am. Educat. Res. J. 3: 241–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, E. Z., and Coke, E. V. (1966). Variations in phrasing and repetition interval and the recall of sentence materials.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 5: 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, E. J., and Rose, R. J. (1977). Effects of orienting task, spacing of repetitions, and list context on judgments of frequency.Mem. Cognit. 5: 505–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, T. C. (1928). Factors influencing the relative economy of massed and distributed practice in learning.Psychol. Rev. 35: 19–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall.J. Exper. Psychol. 89: 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runquist, W. N. (1983). Some effects of remembering on forgetting.Mem. Cognit. 11: 641–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runquist, W. N. (1986). The effect of testing on the forgetting of related and unrelated associates.Canad. J. Psychol. 40: 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxon, J. (1982). Incremental development: A breakthrough in mathematics.Phi Delta Kappan 63: 482–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. J. (1976). Persistence of the spacing effect in free recall under varying incidental learning conditions.Mem. Cognit. 4: 369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M. A., and Misselt, A. L. (1984). Adaptive feedback and review paradigm for computer-based drills.J. Educat. Psychol. 76: 310–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slamecka, N. J., and Katsaiti, L. T. (1988). Normal forgetting of verbal lists as a function of prior testing.J. Exper. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 14: 716–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. (1988).Educational Psychology: Theory into Practice (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sones, A. M., and Stroud, J. B. (1940). Review with special reference to temporal position.J. Educat. Psychol. 31: 665–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, H. F. (1939). Studies in retention.J. Educat. Psychol. 30: 641–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., Fuson, K. C., Ham, M., and Kim, M. S. (1986). An analysis of addition and subtraction word problems in American and Soviet elementary mathematics textbooks.Cognit. Instruct. 3: 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1916). Notes on practice, improvability and the curve of work.Am. J. Psychol. 27: 550–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toppino, T. C., and DeMesquita, M. (1984). Effects of spacing repetitions on children's memory.J. Exper. Child Psychol. 37: 637–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toppino, T. C., and DiGeorge, W. (1984). The spacing effect in free recall emerges with development.Mem. Cognit. 12: 118–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toppino, T. C., and Gracen, T. F. (1985). The lag effect and differential organization theory.J. Exper. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 11: 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J. (1961). Ten years of massed practice on distributed practice.Psychol. Rev. 68: 229–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J. (1970). A breakdown of the total-time law in free-recall learning.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 9: 573–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, G. H., and Anderson, R. C. (1971). Effects of three types of inserted questions learning from prose.J. Educat. Psychol. 62: 387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, W. B., II, and Bjork, R. A. (1977). Learning from tests: Effects of spacing.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 16: 456–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk, A. E. (1987).Educational Psychology (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, J. P. (1978).Test Use in Schools. Washington, D.C., National Institute of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister, E. B., and Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't.Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 15: 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dempster, F.N. Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice. Educ Psychol Rev 1, 309–330 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320097

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320097

Key words

Navigation