Intraspecific competition through food robbing in the harvester ant, Messor aciculatus (Fr. Smith), and its consequences on colony survival
Received: 28 April 1994 Revised: 29 September 1994 Accepted: 11 October 1994 DOI:
Cite this article as: Yamaguchi, T. Ins. Soc (1995) 42: 89. doi:10.1007/BF01245701 Summary
Intraspecific interference competition in the harvester ant,
Messor aciculatus, was studied. Colonies of this species were found not to have territories. Some nests were located very close to each other, and the foraging areas of the neighbors usually overlapped. Even though the frequency with which alien and resident ants met was very high in the vicinity of the nest entrances, aggressive interactions between them rarely occurred. However, when hostile workers encountered each other, they exhibited a kind of ritualized combat and the winner ejected, but did not injure the loser. If any aliens entered the nest, some of them were pulled out, mainly by the residents.
Aliens roaming near a neighbor's nest entrance ferociously attacked the residents carrying seeds in their mandibles and robbed them. On other occasions, aliens entered the nest and stole the collected seed. Although seed robbing and stealing occurred among neighboring colonies, there were remarkable differences in the frequency of their occurrence. The results of field observations and experiments suggest the existence of a dominance order among the neighbors. In one instance, extermination of an inferior colony by its neighbor was observed. The raider colony transferred the stored seeds from the nest of the inferior colony to its own and deposited the larvae and workers some distance away from the nest.
The influence of ritualized combat and food robbing on colony activities, and the ecological significance of this interference behavior in terms of spatial distribution and temporal persistence of the nest sites, is discussed.
Key words Messor ants intraspecific competition ritualized combat territory References
Abe, T., 1971. On the food sharing among four species of ants in a sandy grassland I. Food and foraging behavior (in Japanese with English summary).
Jap. J. Ecol. 20
Adams, E. S., 1990. Boundary disputes in the territorial ant
: effects of asymmetries in colony size.
Anim. Behav. 39
Baroni Urbani. C., 1979. Territoriality in social insects. In: The Social Insects, H. R. Hermann, ed. Academic Press, N.Y., pp 91–120.
Czechowski, W., 1984. Tournaments and raids in
(L.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).
Ann. Zool Warszawa 38
DeVita, J., 1979. Mechanisms of interference and foraging among colonies of the harvester ant
in the Mojave desert.
Dobrzański, J., 1966. Contribution to the ethology of
Acta Biol. Exper.
Ettershank, G. and J. A. Ettershank. 1982. Ritualized fighting in the meat ant
(Smith) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).
J. Aust. Ent. Soc. 21
Gordon, D. M., 1986. The dynamics of the daily round of the harvester ant colony (
Anim. Behav. 34
Gordon, D. M., 1989a. Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants.
Anim. Behav. 38
Gordon, D. M., 1989b. Ants distinguish neighbors from strangers.
Gordon, D. M., 1991. Behavioral flexibility and the foraging ecology of seed-eating ants.
American Naturalist 138
Gordon, D. M., 1992. How colony growth affects forager intrusion between neighboring harvester ant colonies.
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31
Harrison, J. S. and J. B. Gentry, 1981. Foraging pattern, colony distribution, and foraging range of the Florida harvester ant,
Hölldobler, B., 1976a. Tournaments and Slavery in a Desert Ant.
Hölldobler, B., 1976b. Recruitment behavior, Home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants,
Ecol. Sociobiol. 1
Hölldobler, B., 1981. Foraging and spatiotemporal territories in the honey ant
Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9
Hölldobler, B. and C. J. Lumsden, 1980. Territorial strategies in ants.
Hölldobler, B., 1983. Territorial behavior in the Green tree ants (Oecophylla smaragdina).
Hölldobler, B. and E. O. Wilson, 1990.
. 732 pp. The Belknap press of Harvard Univ. press Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Janzen, D. H., 1967. Interaction of bull's-horn acacia (Acacia
L.) with an ant inhabitant (Pseudomyrmex
F. Smith) in eastern Mexico.
Kansas Univ. Sci. Bull. 47
Johnson, R. A., 1991. Learning, memory, and foraging efficiency-in two species of desert seed- harvester ants.
Krebs, R. A. and S. W. Rissing, 1991. Preference for large foundress associations in the desert ant
Anim. Behav. 41
Kubota, M., 1948. Observations on the habits of
Smith (in Japanese). Shin
Le Moli, F. and S. Parmigiani, 1982. Intraspecific combat in the red wood ant (Formica
Aggressive Behav. 8
Le Moli, F., A. Mori, and S. Parmigiani, 1982. Agonistic behavior of
L. (Hymenopera Formicidae).
Monitore zool. ital.
Le Moli, F. and A. Mori, 1986. The aggression test as a possible taxonomic tool in the
Aggressive Behav. 12
Levings, S. C. and J. F. A. Traniello, 1981. Territoriality, nest dispersion and community structure in ant.
Mabelis, A. A., 1979. Wood ant war: the relationship between aggression and predation in the red wood ants (Formica
Neth. J. Zool. 29
Onoyama, K. and T. Abe, 1982. Foraging behavior of the harvester ant
in relation to the amount and distribution of food.
Jap. J. Ecol. 32
Rissing, S. W., 1981. Foraging specializations of individual seed-harvester ants.
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9
Rissing, S. W. and G. B. Pollock, 1987. Queen aggression, pleometrotic advantage and brood raiding in the ant