Focusing biodiversity research on the needs of decision makers
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The project on Biodiversity Uncertainties and Research Needs (BURN) ensures the advancement of usable knowledge on biodiversity by obtaining input from decision makers on their priority information needs about biodiversity and then using this input to engage leading scientists in designing policy-relevant research. Decision makers articulated concerns related to four issues: significance of biodiversity; status and trends of biodiversity; management for biodiversity; and the linkage of social, cultural, economic, legal, and biological objectives. Leading natural and social scientists then identified the research required to address the decision makers' needs and determined the probability of success. The diverse group of experts reached consensus on several fundamental issues, helping to clarify the role of biodiversity in land and resource management. The BURN participants identified several features that should be incorporated into policy-relevant research plans and management strategies for biodiversity. Research and assessment efforts should be: multidisciplinary and integrative, participatory with stakeholder involvement, hierarchical (multiple scales), and problem- and region-specific. The activities should be focused regionally within a global perspective. Meta-analysis of existing data is needed on all fronts to assess the state of the science. More specifically, the scientists recommended six priority research areas that should be pursued to address the information needs articulated by decision makers: (1) characterization of biodiversity, (2) environmental valuation, (3) management for sustainability—for humans and the environment (adaptive management), (4) information management strategies, (5) governance and stewardship issues, and (6) communication and outreach. Broad recommendations were developed for each research area to provide direction for research planning and resource management strategies. The results will directly benefit those groups that require biodiversity research to address their needs—whether to develop policy, manage natural resources, or make other decisions affecting biodiversity.
- Bernabo, J. C. 1995. Communication among scientists, decision makers and society: Developing policy-relevant global climate change research. Pages 103–117in S. Zwerver and others (eds.), Climate change research: Evaluation and policy implications. Report 65A. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 674 pp.
- Carter, T. B., M. C. Barber, and K. D. Smythe. 1993. BURN interim report—phase 1: Decision makers' needs. Science & Policy Associates, Inc. Washington, DC, 20 pp.
- Jutro, P. R. 1993. What biodiversity information do decision makers need?In Proceedings of the Norway/UNEP Expert Conference on Biodiversity. O. T. Sandlund and P. J. Schei (eds.), Directorate for Nature Management and Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway.
- Jutro, P. R. 1994. Broadening participation in the Convention on Biological Diversity: A view from the USA. Pages 381–386in A. F. Krattiger and others (eds.), Widening perspectives on biodiversity. IUCN-International Academy of the Environment, Geneva.
- Jutro, P. R., and T. B. Carter. 1993. EPA responsibilities for administering EPA regulations.Journal of Hazardous Materials 35:173–182.
- Keystone Center. 1991. Final consensus report of the Keystone policy dialogue on biological diversity on federal lands. The Keystone Center, Keystone, Colorado.
- National Research Council. 1980. Research priorities in tropical biology. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
- National Research Council. 1992. Conserving biodiversity: A research agenda for development agencies. Panel on biodiversity research priorities of the Board on Science and Technology for International Development. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 127 pp.
- Solbrig, O. T. 1991. From genes to ecosystems: A research agenda for biodiversity. International Union of Biological Sciences, Paris, 124 pp.
- Soule, M. E., and K. A. Kohm (eds.). 1988. Research priorities in conservation biology. Island Press, Washington, DC, 97 pp.
- US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1992. Biodiversity uncertainty and research needs. EPA Office of Research and Development 600/F-92/024, Washington, DC.
- Focusing biodiversity research on the needs of decision makers
Volume 20, Issue 6 , pp 865-872
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Ecosystem management
- Ecological stewardship
- Sustainable development
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Science & Policy Associates, Inc., The West Tower, Suite 400 1333 H Street NW, 20005, Washington, DC, USA
- 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street S.W. (Mail Code 8401), 20460, Washington, DC, USA