, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 44–51

Technology and prognostic predicaments


DOI: 10.1007/BF01205256

Cite this article as:
Ihde, D. AI & Soc (1999) 13: 44. doi:10.1007/BF01205256


As societies become increasingly technologised, the need for careful and critical assessment rises. However, attempts to assess or normatively evaluate technological development invariably meet with an antinomy: both structurally and historically, technologies display multistable possibilities regarding uses, effects, side effects and other outcomes. Philosophers, usually expected to play applied ethics roles, often come to the scene after these effects are known. But others who participate at the research and development stages find even more difficulties with prognosis. Recent work on ‘revenge’ effects (Tenner) and negative side effects (Kevles) are examined, as well as several cases of philosophers in ‘R&D’ roles. After sketching the antinomy,I outline a heuristic pragmatics of prognosis that addresses this quandary.

Key Words

AssessmentEthicsPrognosisResearch and developmentSide effects

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySUNY at Stony BrookNew YorkUSA