Figures of merit to compare distributed linear inverse solutions
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper introduces the concept of the resolution matrix as the basis for an objective theoretical comparison of distributed linear inverse solutions to the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem. In particular, we describe how figures of merit derived from the resolution matrices can be represented graphically to evaluate merits and shortcomings of the different solutions. The use of the figures of merit is illustrated with two solutions that consider minimal a priori information about the generators: Classical Minimum Norm and Backus Gilbert. We recommend to start any analysis with the individual exploration of the resolution kernel for each grid point or at least for those points where the activity is likely to occur. This analysis might help in selecting the optimal inverse for the sources that are supposed to be active in the process under study.
- Backus, G.E. and Gilbert, J.F. Numerical applications of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1967, 13:247–276.
- Backus, G.E. and Gilbert, J.F. The resolving power of gross earth data. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1968, 16:169–205.
- Backus, G.E. and Gilbert, J.F. Uniquenness in the inversion of gross earth data. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 1970, 266:123–192.
- Bertero, M., De Mol, C., Pike, E.R. Linear inverse problems with discrete data. I: General formulation and singular system analysis. Inverse Problem, 1985, 1: 301–330.
- Brenner, D., Williamson, S.J. and Kauffman, L. Visually evoked magnetic fields of the human brain. Science, 1975, 190: 480–481.
- Greenblatt, R.E. Probabilistic reconstruction of multiple sources in the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem. Inverse Problems, 1993, 9: 271–284.
- Hämäläinen, M.S. and Ilmoniemi, R.J. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: Estimates of Current Distributions., Technical Report TKK-F-A559, Helsinski University of Technology, 1984.
- Hämäläinen, M. Interpretation of Neuromagnetic measurements: Modeling and Statistical Considerations. Ph. D. Thesis, Espoo, Finland, 1987.
- Ilmoniemi, R.J. Estimates of Neuronal Current Distributions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1991, Suppl, 491: 80–87.
- ISBET Newsletter. No 5. November 1994. Ed. W. Skrandies.
- Jackson, D.D. Interpretation of Inaccurate, Insufficient and Inconsistent data. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. soc., 1972, 28:97–110.
- Menke, W. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete inverse theory. Academic Press, 1984.
- O'Sullivan F. A Statistical perspective on ill-posed inverse problems. 1986, 1. No. 4, 502–527.
- Peng, C., Rodi, W. and Toksoz, M.N. Smoothest-model reconstruction from projections. Inverse Problem, 1993, 9:339–354.
- Figures of merit to compare distributed linear inverse solutions
Volume 9, Issue 2 , pp 117-124
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press
- Additional Links
- Distributed solutions
- Inverse problem
- Distributed source models
- Figures of merit