Human intelligence and Turing Test
- Adam Drozdek
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The Turing Test (TT) is criticised for various reasons, one being that it is limited to testing only human-like intelligence. We can read, for example, that ‘TT is testing humanity, not intelligence,’ (Fostel, 1993), that TT is ‘a test for human intelligence, not intelligence in general,’ (French, 1990), or that a perspective assumed by TT is parochial, arrogant and, generally, ‘massively anthropocentric’ (Hayes and Ford, 1996). This limitation presumably causes a basic inadequacy of TT, namely that it misses a wide range of intelligence by focusing on one possibility only, namely on human intelligence. The spirit of TT enforces making explanations of possible machine intelligence in terms of what is known about intelligence in humans, thus possible specificity of the computer intelligence is ruled out from the oælset.
This approach causes ire in some interpreters of the test and leads them to desire to create a theory of intelligence in general, thereby overcoming the limitations imposed by merely human intelligence. At times it is an emotion-laden discussion that does not hesitate to impute chauvinism in those limiting themselves to human-type intelligence.1 This discussion is, by the way, not unlike the rhetoric used by some defenders of animal rights, who insist that an expression of superiority of men over animals is a token of speciesism, and ‘speciesism is just a moral mistake of the same sort as racism and sexism’.
- Dewdney, A.K. (1992). Turing Test, Scientific America. January. 32.
- Drozdek, A. (1995). Moral Dimension of Man in the Age of Computers. University of America Press, Lanham, MD, USA. Ch. 2.
- Drozdek, A. (1996). Descartes: Mathematics and Sacredness of Infinity,Laval Théologique et Philosophique.52(1). 167–178.
- Fostel, G. (1993). The Turing Test is for the Birds, SIGARTBulletin. 4(1). 8.
- Fox, M. (1992). Sheer Joy: Conversations with Thomas Aquinas on Creation Spirituality. Harper, San Francisco.
- French, R.M. (1990). Subcognition and Limits of the Turing Test,Mind. 99. 53–65.
- Gelernter, D. (1994). The Muse in the Machine: Computers and Creative Thought. Fourth Estate, London.
- Hanley, T.B. (1990). Chauvinism and Science: Another Reply to Shanon,Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 20. 94.
- Hayes, P. and Ford, K. (1995). Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJAI-95). Montreal, August 1996, 972–977.
- Hettinger, E. (1991). The Responsible Use of Animals in Biomedical Research. In Baird, R.M. and Rosenbaum, S.E. (eds)Animal Experimentation: The Moral Issues. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY, USA, 120.
- Leiber, J. (1989). Shannon on the Turing Test,Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 19, 257, 258.
- Locke, J. (1690). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. (2.17.1).
- Marinoff, L. (1996). Has Turing Test Slain the Jabberwock?Informatica. 19. 513–526.
- Mauldin, M. (1994). ChatterBots, TinyMuds, and the Turing Test Entering the Loebner Prize Competition. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA.1. 16–21.
- Human intelligence and Turing Test
AI & SOCIETY
Volume 12, Issue 4 , pp 315-321
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Loebner competition
- Turing test
- Industry Sectors
- Adam Drozdek (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA