Measuring the predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion pumps
First Online: 01 February 1992 Received: 30 August 1990 Revised: 09 December 1991 DOI:
Cite this article as: Varvel, J.R., Donoho, D.L. & Shafer, S.L. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics (1992) 20: 63. doi:10.1007/BF01143186 Abstract
Current measures of the performance of computer-controlled infusion pumps (CCIPs) are poorly defined, of little use to the clinician using the CCIP, and pharmacostatistically incorrect. We propose four measures be used to quantitate the performance of CCIPs: median absolute performance error (MDAPE), median performance error (MDPE), divergence, and wobble. These measures offer several significant advantages over previous measures. First, their definitions are based on the performance error as a fraction of the predicted (rather than measured) drug concentration, making the measures much more useful to the clinician. Second, the measures are defined in a way that addresses the pharmacostatistical issue of appropriate estimation of population parameters. Finally, the measure of inaccuracy, MDAPE, is defined in a way that is consistent with iteratively reweighted least squares nonlinear regression, a commonly used method of estimating pharmacokinetic parameters. These measures make it possible to quantitate the overall performance of a CCIP or to compare the predictive performance of CCIPs which differ in either general approach (e.g., compartmental model driven vs. plasma efflux approach), pump mechanics, software algorithms, or pharmacokinetic parameter sets.
Key words anesthesia computer-assisted equipment infusion pump performance pharmacokinetics predictive performance References
J. M. Alvis, J. G. Reves, A. V. Govier, P. G. Menkhaus, C. E. Henling, J. A. Spain, and E. Bradley. Computer-assisted continuous infusions of fentanyl during cardiac anesthesia: Comparison with a manual method.
M. E. Ausems, D. R. Stanski, and C. C. Hug. An evaluation of the accuracy of pharmacokinetic data for the computer assisted infusion of alfentanil.
Br. J. Anaesth.
D. P. Crankshaw, M. D. Boyd, and A. R. Bjorksten. Plasma drug efflux—A new approach to optimization of drug infusion for constant blood concentration of thiopental and methohexital.
S. L. Shafer, L. C. Siegel, J. E. Cooke, and J. C. Scott. Testing computer-controlled infusion pumps by simulation.
D. B. Raemer, A. Buschman, J. R. Varvel, B. K. Philip. M. D. Johnson, D. A. Stein, and S. L. Shafer. The prospective use of population pharmacokinetics in a computer-driven infusion system for alfentanil.
M. Michiels, R. Hendriks, and J. Heykants. A sensitive radioimmunoassay for fentanyl: Plasma level in dogs and man.
Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
P. O. Maitre, S. Vozeh, J. Heykants, D. A. Thomson, and D. R. Stanski. Population pharmacokinetics of alfentanil: The average dose-plasma concentration relationship and interindividual variability in patients.
J. C. Scott and D. R. Stanski. Decreased fentanyl and alfentanil requirements with age: A simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
P. O. Maitre, M. E. Ausems, S. Vozeh, and D. R. Stanski. Evaluating the accuracy of using population pharmacokinetic data to predict plasma concentrations of alfentanil.
M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier.
Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982.
SYSTAT: The System for Statistics, SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, IL, 1988.
L. B. Sheiner. The population approach to pharmacokinetic data analysis: Rationale and standard data analysis methods.
Drug. Metab. Rev.
W. J. Dixon and F. J. Massey.
Introduction to Statistical Analysis, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.
R. J. Carroll and D. Ruppert.
Transformation and Weighting in Regression
, Chapman and Hall, London, 1988.
S. Vozeh, P. O. Maitre, and D. R. Stanski. Evaluation of population (NONMEM) pharmacokinetic parameter estimates.
J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm.
S. L. Shafer, G. M. Martinez, D. R. Stanski, and J. C. Scott. Pharmacokinetic analysis of fentanyl administered by a computer controlled infusion pump.
L. B. Sheiner and S. L. Beal. Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.
J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm.
P. O. Maitre and D. R. Stanski. Bayesian forecasting improves the prediction of intraoperative plasma concentrations of alfentanil.
S. L. Shafer, J. R. Varvel, N. Aziz, and J. C. Scott. The performance of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from a computer controlled infusion pump.
P. Glass, J. R. Jacobs, E. D. Hawkins, B. Ginsberg, T. J. Quill, and J. G. Reeves. Accuracy and efficacy of a pharmacokinetic model-driven device to infuse fentanyl for anesthesia during general surgery.
S. L. Shafer, J. R. Varvel, N. Aziz, and J. C. Scott. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump.
P. Glass, J. R. Jacobs, L. R. Smith, B. Ginsberg, T. J. Quill, S. A. Bai, and J. G. Reves. Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of fentanyl: assessment of accuracy.
R. J. Serfling.
Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics
, Wiley, New York, 1980.
P. J. Huber.
Robust Statistics, Wiley, New York, 1982.
F. J. Anscombe and J. W. Tukey. The examination and analysis of residuals,
Technometrics, Vol. 5, 1963.
D. C. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, and J. W. Tukey.
Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1983.
F. Mosteller and J. W. Tukey.
Data Analysis and Regression: A Second Course, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1977.
D. B. Raemer, A. Buschman, M. D. Johnson, B. K. Philip, S. L. Shafer, and D. R. Stanski. Alfentanil pharmacokinetic model applied to ambulatory surgical patients: Does a computerized infusion improve predictability?
CrossRef Copyright information
© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992