Physicians, battery, and the duty to give informed consent
- Mark Strasser Ph.D.
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This essay discusses the issue of informed consent as it relates not only to physician duty but also to patient duty. The author is particularly concerned with the possibility of battery charges against the physician unless a clear patient duty is articulated. In summary, the author concludes that we can prevent doctors from being forced to commit battery in a way which allows them to make reasonable choices for their patients without being open to the charge of having committed battery. At the same time, we would not allow doctors to abuse this privelege.
- Hull, R. (1985). Informed consent: Patient's right or patient's duty?The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10, 183–197.
- Marcus, R. (1980). Moral dilemmas and consistency.Journal of Philosophy, 77 (3), 121–136.
- Physicians, battery, and the duty to give informed consent
The Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics
Volume 8, Issue 1 , pp 40-48
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19257, 76019, Arlington, TX