Charge reduction: An analysis of prosecutorial discretion in burglary and robbery cases
- Celesta A. Albonetti
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Although a substantial number of researchers have studied charge reductions taking place within the context of guilty plea negotiations, few have focused on estimating the determinants of charge reductions taking place at the initial screening decision. The prosecutor's decision to reduce original felony charges to a misdemeanor has serious social, legal, and economic consequences for the suspect. This paper presents a model of the variables affecting the likelihood of such a reduction in burglary and robbery offenses. Drawing from Littrell's “principled charging” perspective and earlier research on labeling, the analysis involves estimating logistic regression equations specifying both main and interaction effects of the suspect's gender and race and variables related to suspect character, case seriousness, and legal seriousness. Partial support is found for Littrell's perspective.
- Albonetti, C. A. (1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty.Law Soc. Rev. 2l: 291–313.
- Aldrich, J. H., and Nelson, F. D. (1984).Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
- Bernstein, I. N., Kick, E., Leung, J. T., and Schulz, B. (1977). Charge reduction: An intermediary stage in the process of labelling criminal defendants.Social Forces 56: 363–384.
- Bishop, D. M., and Frazier, C. E. (1984). The effects of gender on charge reduction.Sociol. Q. 25: 385–396.
- Blumberg, A. (1967). The practice of law as a confidence game: Organizational cooptation of a profession.Law and Society Review 15: 15–20.
- Brown, K., and Shaut, M. H. (1976). Note: The use of mandamus to control prosecutorial discretion.Am. Crim. Law Rev. 13: 563–597.
- Cole, O. (1970). The decision to prosecute.Law Soc. Rev. 4: 331–344.
- Cox, S. (1976). Prosecutorial discretion: An overview.Am. Crim. Law Rev. 3: 383–434.
- Davis, K. C. (1969).Discretionary Justice, Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.
- Dworkin, R. M. (1977). Is law a system of rules? In Dworkin, R. M. (ed.),The Philosophy of Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
- Eisenstein, J., and Jacob, H. (1977).Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts, Little & Brown Co., Boston.
- Feeney, F., Dill, F., and Weir, A. (1983). Arrests without conviction: How often they occur and why? U.S. Department of Justice Report, National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C.
- Figueria-McDonough, J. (1985). Gender differences in informal processing: A look at charge bargaining and sentence reduction in Washington, D.C.J. Res, Crime Delinq. 22: 101–133.
- Hanushek, E. A., and Jackson, J. E. (1977).Statistical Methods for Social Scientists, Academic Press, New York.
- Holmes, M. D., Daudistel, H. C., and Farrell, R. A. (1987). Determinants of charge reductions and final dispositions in cases of burglary and robbery.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 24: 233–254.
- Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S. (1989).Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Son, New York.
- Jacoby, J. (1980).The American Prosecutor: A Search for Identity, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
- LaFave, W. R. (1970). The prosecutor's discretion in the United States.Am. J. Comp. Law 18: 532–548.
- Littrell, W. B. (1979).Bureaucratic Justice: Police, Prosecutors, and Plea Bargaining, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
- McDonald, D. F. (1979). From plea negotiation to coercive justice: Notes on the respecification of a concept.Law Soc. Rev. 13: 385–392.
- McHugh, P. (1970). A common-sense conception of deviance. In Douglas, J. D. (ed.),Deviance and Respectability, Basic Books, New York.
- Miller, F. (1970).Prosecution: The Decision to Charge a Suspect with a Crime, Little, Brown, Boston.
- Miller, H. S., McDonald, W. F., and Cramer, J. A. (1978). Plea bargaining in the United States. U.S. Department of Justice report, National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C.
- Milner, N. (1971).The Court and Local Law Enforcement, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
- Nardulli, P., Eisenstein, J., and Flemming, R. B. (1988).The Tenor of Justice, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
- Neubauer, D. (1978). After the arrest: The charging decision in Prairie City. In Atkins, B., and Pogrebin, M. (eds.),The Invisible Justice System: Discretion and the Law, Anderson, Cincinnati.
- Petersen, T. (1985). A comment on presenting results from logit and probit models.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 130–131.
- Ross, H. L. (1970).Settled Out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims Adjustments, Aldine, Chicago.
- Sudnow, D. (1964). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office.Social Problems 12: 255–276.
- Thomas, C. W., and Fitch, W. A. (1976). Prosecutorial decision making.Am. Crim. Law Rev. 13: 507–559.
- Charge reduction: An analysis of prosecutorial discretion in burglary and robbery cases
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
Volume 8, Issue 3 , pp 317-333
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- charge reduction
- prosecutorial discretion
- logit analysis
- interaction effects
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Sociology, Texas A&M University, 77843-4351, College Station, Texas