Doing without representing?
- Andy ClarkAffiliated withPhilosophy Department, Philosophy/Neuroscience/Psychology Program Washington University in St. Louis
- , Josefa ToribioAffiliated withPhilosophy Department, Philosophy/Neuroscience/Psychology Program Washington University in St. Louis
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Connectionism and classicism, it generally appears, have at least this much in common: both place some notion of internal representation at the heart of a scientific study of mind. In recent years, however, a much more radical view has gained increasing popularity. This view calls into question the commitment to internal representation itself. More strikingly still, this new wave of anti-representationalism is rooted not in ‘armchair’ theorizing but in practical attempts to model and understand intelligent, adaptive behavior. In this paper we first present, and then critically assess, a variety of recent anti-representationalist treatments. We suggest that so far, at least, the sceptical rhetoric outpaces both evidence and argument. Some probable causes of this premature scepticism are isolated. Nonetheless, the anti-representationalist challenge is shown to be both important and progressive insofar as it forces us to see beyond the bare representational/non-representational dichotomy and to recognize instead a rich continuum of degrees and types of representationality.
- Doing without representing?
Volume 101, Issue 3 , pp 401-431
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors