Abstract
This paper gives the author's impressions on the following aspects of justice: desert, equity, equality, need, and intergenerational equity. The author concludes that these different aspects cannot be reconciled but instead must be compromised. An example of such a compromise is provided by a discussion of welfare reform. The author claims that rights are correlative with duties, and that asserting the former has little meaning without specifying the latter. He then discusses justice toward groups rather than individuals. He proposes that maintaining cultural variety in the presence of a homogeneous “superculture” is a major problem of the contemporary world. The paper concludes with a discussion of various forms of power, particularly the “integrative power” that people acquire over each other by virtue of ties of loyalty and identity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boulding, K. E. (1972). Social justice in social dynamics. In Brandt, R. B. (ed.),Social Justice, Prentice-Hall, New York, pp. 73–92.
Jencks, C.,et al. (1972).Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America, Basic Books, New York.
Morgan, J. N. (1978). Intra-family transfers revisited: The support of dependents inside the family. In Duncan, G. J., and Morgan, J. N. (eds.),Five Thousand American Families: Patterns of Economic Progress, Vol. 6, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 347–366.
Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Smith, A. (1966).Theory of Moral Sentiments, Augustus M. Kelley Reprints, New York. (Original work published 1759)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boulding, K.E. Social justice as a Holy Grail: The endless quest. Soc Just Res 2, 49–60 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052299
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052299