Ideological stratification: American beliefs about economic justice
- Norma J. Shepelak
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
By integrating systematically the common themes in the stratification and justice literatures, researchers have sought to advance our understanding of the role of ideologies in legitimating inequality. This paper examines how beliefs about meritocracy and opportunity in American society relate to the way people think about reducing income differences between the rich and the poor. Using a national sample of U.S. adults (N=1473), we find that the majority of the respondents believe that America has an open system where achievement is tied to individual abilities and educational opportunities. On the other hand the respondents are split in their views on meritocracy, with 50% believing that an individual's high socioeconomic position is reflective of special abilities. The role of ideologies in influencing beliefs about economic justice is direct in that persons who believe in the tenets of equal opportunity and meritocracy are not in favor of reducing income differences between the rich and the poor. Additionally, stratal differences in beliefs about economic justice are seen, with disadvantaged individuals more likely to question the legitimacy of inequality.
- Alves, W., and Rossi, P. (1978). Who should get what?: Fairness judgments of the distribution of earnings.Am. J. Sociol. 84: 541–564.
- Bell, D. (1972). On meritocracy and equality.Public Interest 29: 29–68.
- Brickman, P., Folger, R., Good, E., and Schul, Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In Lerner, M., and Lerner, S. (eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 173–202.
- Cook, K., Hegtvedt, K., and Yamagishi, T. (1988). Structural inequality, legitimation, and reactions to inequity in exchange networks. In Webster, M., and Foschi, M. (eds.),Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 291–308.
- Della Fave, L. R. (1980). The meek shall not inherit the earth: Self-evaluation and the legitimacy of social stratification.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 955–971.
- Feagin, J. (1975).Subordinating the Poor: Welfare and American Beliefs, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
- Form, W., and Hanson, C. (1985). The consistency of stratal ideologies of economic justice.Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobility 4: 239–269.
- Form, W., and Rytina, J. (1969). Ideological beliefs on the distribution of power in the United States.Am. Sociol. Rev. 34: 19–31.
- Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. (1982).Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York.
- Gurin, P., Miller, A., and Gurin, G. (1980). Stratum identification and consciousness.Soc. Psychol. Quart. 43: 30–47.
- Hochschild, J. (1981).What's Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Huber, J., and Form, W. (1973).Income and Ideology: An Analysis of the American Political Formula, Free Press, New York.
- Jackman, M., and Muha, M. (1984). Education and intergroup attitudes: Moral enlightenment, superficial democratic commitment, or ideological refinement?Am. Sociol. Rev. 49: 751–769.
- Jasso, G., and Rossi, P. (1977). Distributive justice and earned income.Am. Sociol. Rev. 42: 639–651.
- Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 3–32.
- Kluegel, J., and Smith, E. (1981). Beliefs about stratification.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 7: 29–56.
- Kluegel, J., and Smith, E. (1986).Beliefs About Inequality: Americans' Views of What Is and What Ought to Be, Aldine De Gruyter, New York.
- Lane, R. (1959). The fear of inequality.Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 53: 35–51.
- Lerner, M. (1980).The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum Press, New York.
- Lerner, M., and Lerner, S. (1981).The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Plenum Press, New York.
- Lincoln, J., and Kalleberg, A. (1985). Work organization and workforce commitment: A study of plants and employees in the U.S. and Japan.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 738–760.
- Markovsky, B. (1985). Toward a multilevel distributive justice theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 822–839.
- National Opinion Research Center. 1984.General Social Survey, 1984, National Opinion Research Center, Chicago. (Distributed by Roper Public Opinion Research Center, Yale University, New Haven.)
- Robinson, R. and Bell, W. (1978). Equality, success, and social justice in England and the United States.Am. Sociol. Rev. 43: 125–143.
- Runciman, W. (1966).Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Ryan, W. (1981). Equality, Pantheon, New York.
- Rytina, J., Form, W., and Pease, J. (1970). Income and stratification ideology: Beliefs about American opportunity structure.Am. J. Sociol. 75: 703–716.
- Sennett, R., and Cobb, J. (1972).The Hidden Injuries of Class, Vintage, New York.
- Shepelak, N. (1987). The role of self-explanations and self-evaluations in legitimating inequality.Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 495–503.
- Shepelak, N., and Alwin, D. (1986). Beliefs about inequality and perceptions of distributive justice.Am. Sociol. Rev. 51: 30–46.
- Stolte, J. (1983). The legitimation of structural inequality.Am. Sociol. Rev. 48: 331–342.
- Stolte, J. (1987). The formation of justice norms.Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 774–784.
- Thurow, L. (1975).Generating Inequality: Mechanisms of Distribution in the U.S. Economy, Basic Books, New York.
- Ideological stratification: American beliefs about economic justice
Social Justice Research
Volume 3, Issue 3 , pp 217-231
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio