Attorney communication and impression making in the courtroom
This study investigated the effectiveness of attorney communication and impression making in the courtroom. Trained in-court observers rated attorney presentations for factual and legal informativeness, organization, articulateness, and rapport during the opening statement phase of 50 trials. After the trials, jurors were asked to evaluate the attorneys' overall articulateness. enthusiasm, and likableness during the trial. The attorneys were then questioned about their own performance on these indices. The results revealed that the opening statements of prosecuting attorneys were judged by observers as better organized and more factually and legally informative than defense attorneys. However, these variables were not related to trial outcome. Juror evaluations of prosecuting attorneys more closely agreed with these attorneys' self-perceptions of courtroom performance while defense attorneys rated themselves significantly more favorably than did jurors. More courtroom experience did not generally lead to better courtroom performance during opening statements for either prosecuting or defense attorneys, and often resulted in significant overestimations of general performance relative to juror evaluations, particularly among defense attorneys. System constraints operating in favor of prosecutors and performance feedback mechanisms available to prosecutors but not to defense attorneys are discussed. These mechanisms may account for the discrepancies between juror perceptions of attorneys and attorney self-perception.
- Anderson, R. C., & Pickert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1–12.
- Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press.
- Bobrow, D. G., & Norman, D. A. (1975). Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.),Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press.
- Boland, B. (1983). INSLAW, Inc.The prosecution of felony arrests. Washington Bureau of Justice Studies.
- Bower, G. H. (1975). Cognitive psychology: An introduction. In. W. K. Estes (Eds.)Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in comprehension and memory.Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177–220.
- Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places.Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230.
- Burger, W. (1973). The special skills of advocacy: Are specialized training and certification of advocates essential to our system of justice?Fordham Law Review, 42, 227.
- Carter, R. E. (1981). Improving the quality of trial advocacy in civil litigation in the federal courts.Federal Bar News Journal, 40, 291–295, 301.
- Crary, W. G. (1966). Reactions to incongruent self-experiences.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30, 246–252.
- Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972).The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
- Evans, F. R., & Norwood, J. M. (1975).A comparison of the availability of legal representation provided by licensed and student attorneys. Report to the Law Enforcement Assistant Administration (LEAA) University of New Mexico Law School. Albuquerque, NM.
- Feldman, S., & Wilson, K. (1981). The value of interpersonal, skills in lawyering.Law and Human Behavior, 5, 311–324.
- Forston, R. F. (1975). Sense and non-sense: Jury trial communicationBrigham Young University Law Review, 1975, 605–606.
- Frankel, M. E. (1977). Curing lawyers' incompetence: Primum non nocere.Creighton Law Review.10, 613–639.
- Greenberg, M. S., & Ruback, R. B. (1982).Social psychology of the criminal justice system, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Haddad, F. E. Jr. (1979). The criminal case: The opening statement.Trial. 41, 34–35.
- Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, B. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature.American Psychological Review 43, 447–462.
- Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966).The American jury. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Katz, D., & Braley, K. W. (1933). Racial stereotypes of 100 college students.Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 28, 280–290.
- Kerr, N. L. (1982). Trial participants' behaviors and jury verdicts: An exploratory field study. In V. J. Konecni & E. B. Ebbesen (Eds.),The criminal justice system: A social-psychological analysis. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
- Kim, J. (1975). Factor analysis. In N. H. Nie et al. (Eds.),SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Kirk, R. E. (1968).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Klecka, W. R. (1980).Discriminant analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Maddi, D. L. (1978). Trial advocacy competence: The judicial perspective.American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 1978(1), 105–151.
- Maddi, D. L. (1979). Judges' views of lawyers in their courts.American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 1979(3), 689–696.
- Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.
- Mauet, T. A. (1980).Fundamentals of trial techniques. Canada: Little Brown.
- Minsky, M. A. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.),The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Mitchell, S. K. (1979). Interobservers agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies.Psychological Bulletin, 86, 376–390.
- Morrill, A. E. (1973).Trial diplomacy. Chicago: Court Practice Institute.
- Neisser, U. (1976).Cognitive psychology New York: Appleton.
- Platt, A., & Pollock, R. (1976). Channeling lawyers: The careers of public defenders. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.),Psychology ad law. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
- Pyszczynski, T. A., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1981). The effects of opening statements on mock jurors' verdicts in a simulated criminal trial.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 301–313.
- Rosenhan, D. L. (1973). On being sane in insane places.Science, 179, 250–258.
- Ross, L., Lepper, M., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880–892.
- Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.),Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977).Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Shrauger, J. S., & Lund, A. K. (1975). Self-evaluation and reactions to evaluation from others.Journal of Personality, 43, 94–108.
- Shrauger, J. S., & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of the self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly,Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549–573.
- Swann, W. B., & Read, S. J. (1981). Acquiring self-knowledge: The search for feedback that fits.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1119–1128.
- Swann W. B., & Read, S. J. (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 351–372.
- Walster, E., Berscheid, E., Abrahams, D., & Aronson, V. (1967). Effectiveness of debriefing following deception experiments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 371–380.
- Weld, H. P., & Danzig, E. R. (1940). A study of the way in which a verdict is reached by a jury.American Journal of Psychology, 53, 518–536.
- Wyer, R. S., Henninger, M., & Wolfson, M. (1975). Informational determinants of females “self-attributions and observers' judgments of them in an achievement situation”.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 556–570.
- Attorney communication and impression making in the courtroom
Law and Human Behavior
Volume 10, Issue 4 , pp 281-302
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links